2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2012.01358.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does a screening questionnaire for familial and hereditary colorectal cancer risk work in a health insurance population?

Abstract: The aim of our study was to evaluate actual prevalence, uptake and first experiences with a questionnaire developed for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) in persons with familial/hereditary risk. A cross sectional study in an insurance population aged 30-54 years was conducted. Subjects with ICD-10 codes C00 to C97 and D37 to D48 were excluded. A standardised questionnaire was sent to 12,139 subjects. Three months later, subjects with a reported family history were followed by a second questionnaire. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pieper et al. . evaluated a questionnaire to screen individuals at‐risk for hereditary CRC in a sample of private service users in Germany.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pieper et al. . evaluated a questionnaire to screen individuals at‐risk for hereditary CRC in a sample of private service users in Germany.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developed countries also face difficulties related to the identification of HCPS families, due to the increasing demand of patients and families at‐risk for hereditary cancer identified and consequent lack of infrastructure and personnel to meet this growing necessity . This problem will inevitably occur in developing countries such as Brazil as soon as oncogenetics services become available to the entire population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…consecutive or non-consecutive patients in the waiting room of a clinic). In three studies (Mandelson et al 1999;Madlensky et al 2003;Bastani et al 2008), the samples consisted of first-degree relatives of CRC patients, who are known to have an increased risk for CRC (Johns & Houlston 2001) and increased perception of this risk (Stark et al 2006;Rees et al 2008;Pieper et al 2012). In four studies (Lipkus et al 2003;Bastani et al 2008;Ferrante et al 2008;Jones et al 2008), the surveyed were involved in an intervention aimed to increase awareness of CRC (e.g.…”
Section: Study Quality and Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es ist fraglich, ob Patienten eine Frage beantworten können, die selbst durch die Hausärzte der Angehörigen nicht beantwortet werden kann. In der Studie von Pieper et al [10] zum gleichen Fragebogen gaben zu dieser Frage 23 % der eingeschlossenen Patienten "ich weiß nicht" an.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified