2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does a pay-for-performance health service model improve overall and rural–urban inequity in vaccination rates? A difference-in-differences analysis from the Gambia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vaccination is an important component supported by the program, being recognized as one of the pillars of infant mortality prevention. These results corroborate those obtained in similar studies [ 20 , 25 , 26 ] including in Nigeria where performance-based financing has contributed to polio eradication [ 27 ]. However, in some studies performance-based financing has not resulted in improved immunization coverage [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Vaccination is an important component supported by the program, being recognized as one of the pillars of infant mortality prevention. These results corroborate those obtained in similar studies [ 20 , 25 , 26 ] including in Nigeria where performance-based financing has contributed to polio eradication [ 27 ]. However, in some studies performance-based financing has not resulted in improved immunization coverage [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Existing literature found PbR to have little effect on extreme poverty (those in the lowest quintiles) [ 13 , 15 , 20 , 21 ] but to have positive effects on rural–urban inequalities [ 14 ]. Notably, many studies argued that PbR interventions tended to be clinic- or facility-based and did not necessarily address structural health system challenges [ 14 , 22 ], including: the large out-of-pocket expenditure for the ultra-poor [ 23 ], bias interpreting how to apply the criteria [ 15 ], and more practical barriers such as lack of transport and lack of awareness of the benefits [ 20 ]. Likewise, the strategies in WISH were focused on clinic- or outreach service-based, and this may have limited their effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%