2021
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does a Loaded Warm-Up Influence Jump Asymmetry and Badminton-Specific Change of Direction Performance?

Abstract: Purpose: Previously, it has been shown that loaded warm-up (LWU) can improve change-of-direction speed (CODS) in professional badminton players. However, the effect of asymmetry on CODS in badminton players and the influence of LWU on asymmetry has not been examined. Methods: A total of 21 amateur badminton players (age 29.5 [8.4] y, playing experience 8.4 [4.2] y) completed 2 trials. In the first, they performed a control warm-up. In the second, they performed the same warm-up but with 3 exercises loaded with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results revealed that the GW + VR and GW + double VR protocols did not improve the CMJ asymmetry performance, which is consistent with a study that reported no significant effects of a loaded warm-up protocol on a single leg CMJ asymmetry performance [47]. For example, the previous study reported no significant differences in the change of direction speed, single-leg CMJ, or single-leg CMJ asymmetry performance between the traditional dynamic warm-up protocol (including DS, jogging, step, jump, and corner shadow play drill) and a warm-up protocol with a weight vest (10% body mass vest was worn for the performance jump and corner shadow play drill [47]. In contrast, Mangine et al revealed that rugby athletes completed three maximal, 40 m sprint trials while being tethered to a robotic resistance device (loaded at 147.1N), which reduced the bilateral asymmetry [48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results revealed that the GW + VR and GW + double VR protocols did not improve the CMJ asymmetry performance, which is consistent with a study that reported no significant effects of a loaded warm-up protocol on a single leg CMJ asymmetry performance [47]. For example, the previous study reported no significant differences in the change of direction speed, single-leg CMJ, or single-leg CMJ asymmetry performance between the traditional dynamic warm-up protocol (including DS, jogging, step, jump, and corner shadow play drill) and a warm-up protocol with a weight vest (10% body mass vest was worn for the performance jump and corner shadow play drill [47]. In contrast, Mangine et al revealed that rugby athletes completed three maximal, 40 m sprint trials while being tethered to a robotic resistance device (loaded at 147.1N), which reduced the bilateral asymmetry [48].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this regard, the relationship between inter-limb asymmetry and performance measures is not yet conclusive [ 3 ], and thus warrants further investigation. Furthermore, studies have focused on unilateral jumping inter-limb asymmetries across different sports (e.g., soccer, skateboarders, cricket, basketball, badminton, tennis) and within a specific gender (i.e., either male or female) [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. However, inter-limb jump asymmetry (i.e., using dry land tests such as CMJ and SLJ) among young male and female swimmers and their relationship with sport-specific performance has received little attention in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%