2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DoE-based history matching for probabilistic uncertainty quantification of thermo-hydro-mechanical processes around heat sources in clay rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
7

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A software written in Python is used to conduct the sensitivity analysis. It is based on a development by the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) in Leipzig for sensitivity and uncertainty analyses in radioactive waste repository research by Buchwald et al (2020) and was adapted and further developed for application to BHEs. The Python software is coupled with the simulation software OGS via the application programming interface (API) ogs6py (Buchwald et al 2021).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A software written in Python is used to conduct the sensitivity analysis. It is based on a development by the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) in Leipzig for sensitivity and uncertainty analyses in radioactive waste repository research by Buchwald et al (2020) and was adapted and further developed for application to BHEs. The Python software is coupled with the simulation software OGS via the application programming interface (API) ogs6py (Buchwald et al 2021).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods provide information about parameter influences based on the smallest possible representative number of parameter variations (Campolongo et al 2007). The OVAT method is used in this study as described by Buchwald et al (2020). Starting from a base setting of the parameters, two calculations are carried out for each parameter with its maximum and minimum values.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the phase-field approach is costly regarding computation time, we studied the risk using a proxy model. For this purpose, we employed a workflow (Figure 1) similar to an approach used elsewhere to study uncertainties in the context of reservoir engineering [4] or waste repositories [7] based on a history matching and Design-of-Experiments Approach and also very similar to a proxy-based approach for studying sensitivity and uncertainty of fracture properties of nanocomposites with the phase field method [18]. As no detailed data on parameter distributions for our set of parameters was available, we used a uniform probability density function for all parameters.…”
Section: Description Of the Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these fracturing simulations are computationally costly. Furthermore, computational costs become infeasible if we are to estimate the sensitivity of the parameters and assess risks under various scenarios, For this reason, we have embedded the fracturing simulation in a risk analysis tool, the Design of Experiments (DoE) [4,5,6,7], which develops a computationally inexpensive proxy model based on a reduced set of significant parameters known as heavy hitters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we used an LHS-based surrogate approach (Buchwald et al 2020). Here, a number of samples of NGWM input parameter vectors are selected at random via the LHS method.…”
Section: Application Example: Calibration With Bo Example Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%