2017
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.12609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dodged debts and the submissive predator: perspectives on Amazonian relations of dependence

Abstract: This article explores the nature of inter‐ethnic asymmetry and the dynamic of long‐term dependence in Amazonia. Drawing on the case of the Sanema and their neighbouring Ye'kwana, it seeks to gain a deeper understanding of submission and indebtedness with a view to rethinking where the power might lie in such relationships. The association between the two groups, I argue, is motivated by the Sanema's pursuit of manufactured items, access to which the Ye'kwana had historically monopolized. The dynamic entered in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…But disability in other societies can be more associated with the “socio‐centric” value of being part of social networks of dependencies rather than with individual work capacity, appearance, or ability (e.g., Livingston ; Nicolaisen ; Whyte and Ingstad , 11). Dependencies on others, in this perspective, can be not a backward system but a valued achievement and a route toward social mobility (e.g., Ferguson ; Penfield ; Scherz ). In sub‐Saharan Africa, “wealth in people” (Guyer ; Miers and Kopytoff ) as a mode of political power and a way of becoming a valuable person demonstrates how dependencies can be desired.…”
Section: Dependency and The Desired Social Contractmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But disability in other societies can be more associated with the “socio‐centric” value of being part of social networks of dependencies rather than with individual work capacity, appearance, or ability (e.g., Livingston ; Nicolaisen ; Whyte and Ingstad , 11). Dependencies on others, in this perspective, can be not a backward system but a valued achievement and a route toward social mobility (e.g., Ferguson ; Penfield ; Scherz ). In sub‐Saharan Africa, “wealth in people” (Guyer ; Miers and Kopytoff ) as a mode of political power and a way of becoming a valuable person demonstrates how dependencies can be desired.…”
Section: Dependency and The Desired Social Contractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the beggars’ written and oral flattery invokes models of patronage common in many parts of Africa (e.g., Barber ; Irvine ; Vail and White ), and which hold a prominent position in various aspects of Kinois popular culture (e.g., White ; Pype ). Beggars performed deference as a “declaration of dependence” to extract resources (Bonilla ; Penfield ), and the declaration had a coercive edge.…”
Section: Making the Roundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). Other scholars recognize relationships of dependence by voluntary submission, such as among the Huaorani (Rival ), Sanema (Penfield ), and Urarina (Walker ), or by being, like Cofán, ungrateful predators whose predatory agency is beyond Cofán initiative and control (Cepek ). While illustrating asymmetrical aspects of care among the Urarina, Walker (:209) has noted that moral conceptions of what is good and valuable relate to how “the self is made through accompaniment and cannot be reduced to a stable or unitary point of view.” Londoño Sulkin () finds an “Amazonian package” of resemblances among lowland South American indigenous peoples: that human bodies are socially fabricated, within the context of a perspectival cosmos, and that relations with dangerous outside others are indispensable to this process.…”
Section: Ontology and Animal Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predation and commensality have been described as distinct, "yet dynamically articulated forms of producing people and sociality" (Fausto 2007:500)-a notion furthered by attention to unequal relationships of mastery (control and/or protection), ownership, and nurture (cultivation and care of the quality of humanity) in Amazonia (Brightman et al 2016). Other scholars recognize relationships of dependence by voluntary submission, such as among the Huaorani (Rival 1999), Sanema (Penfield 2017), and Urarina (Walker 2013), or by being, like Cofán, ungrateful predators whose predatory agency is beyond Cofán initiative and control (Cepek 2015). While illustrating asymmetrical aspects of care among the Urarina, Walker (2013:209) has noted that moral conceptions of what is good and valuable relate to how "the self is made through accompaniment and cannot be reduced to a stable or unitary point of view."…”
Section: Ontology and Animal Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%