2002
DOI: 10.1086/jar.58.1.3631071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Documents, Ceramics, Tree Rings, and Luminescence: Estimating Final Native Abandonment of the Lower Rio Chama

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The site consists of multistoried adobe room blocks with as many as 1100 rooms arranged around a plaza (Duwe et al, 2016). The site was inhabited from roughly A.D. 1350 to 1550 (Fowles, 2004; Ramenofsky & Feathers, 2002), with the main period of occupation beginning in the early fifteenth century (Robinson & Warren, 1971).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The site consists of multistoried adobe room blocks with as many as 1100 rooms arranged around a plaza (Duwe et al, 2016). The site was inhabited from roughly A.D. 1350 to 1550 (Fowles, 2004; Ramenofsky & Feathers, 2002), with the main period of occupation beginning in the early fifteenth century (Robinson & Warren, 1971).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also clear that the overall population of the VEP II study area declined gradually between the middle decades of the 1400s and 1600, by which time the first Spanish capital of New Mexico had been established at Yunge-owingeh (Ellis 1989). In the early decades of the seventeenth century, the population of Tewa settlements declined dramatically due to a variety of factors, including captive taking, the marriage of Pueblo women with Spaniard men, epidemic disease, and out-migration to areas beyond Spanish control (Barrett 2002;Kulisheck 2010;Ramenofsky and Feathers 2002;Trigg and Gold 2005). During the later seventeenth century, population increased again, most likely due to the movement of Southern Tewa populations into the study area during the Pueblo Revolt and Reconquest periods; however, it declined once again after 1700 due to the departure of several groups for the Hopi Mesas (Marshall and Walt 2007) and renewed intermarriage and acculturation with Spanish populations.…”
Section: From Site To Regional Population Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases these two methods enable exceptionally precise site-level and regional chronologies (e.g., Reed and Hensler 2001;Varien 1999). Many chronological tools could be updated, however, through more effective analytical and field methods (e.g., Ortman et al 2007;Ramenofsky and Feathers 2002;Ramenofsky et al 2009;Seymour 2010), collaborative reevaluation of the date ranges of pottery types, and greater use of alternative techniques precise enough to examine site use life or post-10 occupational activities, for which tree-ring dating is difficult or impractical (e.g., Ahlstrom 2008;Cordell et al 2008;Plog and Heitman 2010). The precision of Ancestral Pueblo chronologies enables research focused on changes at generational or even finer temporal scales, a goal of current research in many parts of the world (Beck et al 2007;Bolender 2010;Shennan 2013;Sherratt 2004;Whittle et al 2011).…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%