2005
DOI: 10.7826/isr-um.06.585031.001.05.0010.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Documentation of Cognitive Functioning Measures in the Health and Retirement Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
370
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(374 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(20 reference statements)
4
370
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 for a review). We measured numeracy using the numeracy module of the US Health and Retirement Study (36). We found that, similar to previous reports (37), our adolescents and older adults had lower numerical skills than young or midlife adults (Fig.…”
Section: Significancesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…35 for a review). We measured numeracy using the numeracy module of the US Health and Retirement Study (36). We found that, similar to previous reports (37), our adolescents and older adults had lower numerical skills than young or midlife adults (Fig.…”
Section: Significancesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Composite scores for ADL difficulty were computed and cut-offs determined a priori to represent no limitations (0), mild/moderate limitations (1-2), and severe limitations (3 or more). The HRS tests cognitive function using well-described methods; [29][30][31][32][33] final models used a binary measure to describe patients as having no cognitive impairment versus any cognitive impairment. Two binary measures related to disability were obtained from the HRS data: whether the patient required nursing home services during the most recent HRS interview, or had used home health care services in the 2 years prior to the interview.…”
Section: Data Sources and Measures Of Disability And Social Determinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-respondents were classified into cognition strata based on the full set of HRS cognitive tests (aggregate scores ranging from 0-35). Herzog, et al (1997) and Ofstedal et al (2005) provide a detailed description of these HRS cognition measures. Proxy respondents were classified based on scores ranging from 1.0 to 5.0 on the IQCODE scale (Jorm, 1994).…”
Section: B Sample Stratification Sample Allocation and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%