2006
DOI: 10.1007/11765448_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Document Space Adapted Ontology: Application in Query Enrichment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 are implemented and individually tested. These components are all related to the Query enrichment component that was presented in a paper [7] at the NLDB 2006 conference 8 , depicted as paper 1 in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 are implemented and individually tested. These components are all related to the Query enrichment component that was presented in a paper [7] at the NLDB 2006 conference 8 , depicted as paper 1 in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our approach [7], we propose a query enrichment approach that uses contextually enriched ontologies to bring the queries closer to the user's preferences and the characteristics of the document collection. The idea is to associate every concept (classes and instances) of the ontology with a feature vector (ƒv) to tailor these concepts to the specific document collection and terminology used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ontology used for analysing data and interpreting user needs may allow data to be related across phases and disciplines, helping people collaborate and reducing costs and risks. Based on the work done on the IIP project, Tomassen et al (2006) proposed a method to improve information retrieval quality by using ontologies. The ontology used is the one developed in IIP, which is based on ISO 13628 and it will be modelled in ISO 15926.…”
Section: Kiritsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupervised keyphrase extraction has the advantage of being more widely applicable, since the method does not require any knowledge of the domain or consultation of domain experts. On the other hand, supervised keyphrase extraction normally produces more relevant keyphrases and can with repeated training improve the quality of its own keyphrases (see for example [18,20,22]). A list of keyphrases gives a high-level summary of the document content.…”
Section: Ontology Learning With Unsupervised Keyphrase Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Voorhees, it is not obvious that adding semantically related terms will improve the quality of the search application [21]. However, experiments with domain-dependent vocabularies -instead of Voorhees' WordNet approach -does indicate that careful semantic refinement of queries may be useful [18]. Mitra et al [13] is refining the query based on blind feedback, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%