Sigir ’94 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-2099-5_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Document Filtering for Fast Ranking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the calculation of the similarity values instead of an accumulator array dynamic data structures can be used for memory efficiency [Witten, 1994]. A partial query evaluation or pruning strategy and its effectiveness and efficiency should also be investigated [Brown, 1995;Moffat, Zobel, 1996;Persin 1994]. Our scalability experiments (Table XIII) and the results reported in [Moffat, Zobel, 1996] imply that when our ICsIIS approach is combined with the restricted accumulators (quit and continue methods of Moffat and Zobel), it can further improve the efficiency performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the calculation of the similarity values instead of an accumulator array dynamic data structures can be used for memory efficiency [Witten, 1994]. A partial query evaluation or pruning strategy and its effectiveness and efficiency should also be investigated [Brown, 1995;Moffat, Zobel, 1996;Persin 1994]. Our scalability experiments (Table XIII) and the results reported in [Moffat, Zobel, 1996] imply that when our ICsIIS approach is combined with the restricted accumulators (quit and continue methods of Moffat and Zobel), it can further improve the efficiency performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As a result, the efficiency of FS decreases with increasing query length, since for each query term another posting list must be processed. It is possible to employ a partial evaluation (or pruning) strategy that skips some of the query terms to improve search efficiency with similar search effectiveness [Buckley, Lewit, 1985;Brown, 1995;Persin, 1994;Moffat, Zobel, 1996].…”
Section: Previous and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite various attempts to displace inverted indexes from their dominant position for document ranking tasks over the years, no alternative has been able to consistently produce the same level of efficiency, effectiveness, and time / space trade-offs that inverted indexes can provide (see, for instance Zobel et al [45]). Ranked document retrieval requires that only the top-k documents are returned, and, as a result, researchers have proposed many heuristic approaches to improve top-k efficiency [1,4,5,6,32,38]. These approaches can be classified in two general categories: term-at-a-time (TAAT) and document-at-a-time (DAAT).…”
Section: Inverted Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of filters [22] is an evaluation technique that allows to recognize what documents are probable of being ranked, reducing the main memory volume required and the queries evaluation time, without harming the effectiveness of results. Because of that, we use the filtering technique proposed by Persin [21] to discard the irrelevant documents for the queries. It uses two filters: the f ins to reduce the amount of memory used and f add to reduce the CPU time.…”
Section: Distributed Inverted Files and Vector Space Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%