Doctoral profile of the medical radiation sciences: a baseline for Australia and New Zealand

Abstract

IntroductionResearch is critical to evidence‐based practice, and the rapid developments in technology provide opportunities to innovate and improve practice. Little is known about the research profile of the medical radiation science (MRS) profession in Australia and New Zealand (NZ). This study provides a baseline of their doctoral activity.MethodsA cross‐sectional survey of MRS professionals in Australia and NZ holding a doctorate or undertaking doctoral studies, was performed using an online tool (Bristol Online Survey®, Bristol, UK). A chain‐referral sampling technique was adopted for data collection. An email invitation with a link to the survey was generated and distributed through email and social media. The survey contained questions related to participant demographics, doctoral status, qualification route, funding and employment.ResultsThere were 63 responses to the survey comprising 50.8% diagnostic radiographers (DRs; n = 32), 23.8% radiation therapists (RTs; n = 15), with the remaining 25.4% (n = 16) equally split between sonographers and nuclear medicine technologists (NMTs). A total of 40 (63.5%) of respondents had completed their doctoral qualification. In NZ, only DRs held a doctoral award constituting 0.3% of DRs and 0.2% of the total registered MRS population. In Australia, there was a greater proportion of doctoral NMTs (n = 8/1098; 0.7%) than RTs (n = 15/2394; 0.6%) and DRs (n = 27/12,001; 0.2%).ConclusionSimilar to other countries, findings show a very small percentage of doctoral MRS professionals in Australia and NZ. Strategies to engage and support individuals in research, up to and beyond doctoral study, need to be embedded in practice.

Is Empowerment of Female Radiologists Still Needed? Findings of a Systematic Review

“…After screening for titles and abstracts, we assessed 115 full texts for eligibility. Fifty-four articles [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ] were then excluded because of different reasons such as a mismatch with inclusion criteria and unavailability of the full text (see Figure 1 and ...…”

Radiation therapists' perspectives on participating in research

“…In comparison, Wright, Hilder and Schneider-Kolsky reported that 32 RTs were completing or had completed Higher Degrees by Research. 2 More recently Ekpo et al 21 reported that 15 RTs had completed doctoral studies in Australia. The total number of Australian RTs with Higher Degrees by Research is not published, but it is likely this study did not capture all RTs who have completed or enrolled in Higher Degrees by Research or those who are participating in research.…”

Analysis of recent Australasian Sonographers Association (ASA) conference abstracts: How many progress to publication?

“…This trend has also been observed in radiography with the number of doctoral awards, publications and citations increasing annually, reflecting a growth in research participation 40 . Australia's radiography workforce holds approximately 0.6% with doctoral qualifications, while only medical doctors in New Zealand hold doctoral qualifications (0.3%) 41 …”

“…40 Australia's radiography workforce holds approximately 0.6% with doctoral qualifications, while only medical doctors in New Zealand hold doctoral qualifications (0.3%). 41 It is difficult to measure research impact, particularly in clinically based fields such as allied health where research success might be measured as clinical impact rather than traditional research metrics such as citation rate. 33,42 Metrics can provide a simplistic mechanism to monitor effects such as research impact by citation count, however this is not always truly reflective of impact.…”