1992
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90324-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dobutamine stress echocardiography: Correlation with coronary lesion severity as determined by quantitative angiography

Abstract: This study was performed 1) to determine the ability of dobutamine stress echocardiography to detect stenoses in individual coronary arteries by utilizing a new model of coronary artery distribution; 2) to evaluate its ability to detect coronary artery stenosis with a minimal lumen diameter less than 1 mm; and 3) to correlate the heart rate at which a positive test result occurs with the severity of coronary artery disease. Eighty-five patients were identified who underwent both dobutamine stress echocardiogra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
109
1
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
109
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…11,[17][18][19] Those findings are concordant with our study, suggesting that the ischemic threshold extracted from continuous monitoring of LV function during EE could represent a reliable tool for the evaluation of the severity of coronary stenosis. 20,21 Our data also confirm the diagnostic accuracy of EE for the detection of patients with single-vessel CAD.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…11,[17][18][19] Those findings are concordant with our study, suggesting that the ischemic threshold extracted from continuous monitoring of LV function during EE could represent a reliable tool for the evaluation of the severity of coronary stenosis. 20,21 Our data also confirm the diagnostic accuracy of EE for the detection of patients with single-vessel CAD.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…8 In both studies, regional function (wall motion and thickening) was assessed visually by consensus of 2 experienced observers using a 4-point scale (1, normal; 2, hypokinesis; 3, akinesis; 4, dyskinesis). Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for regional functional scoring was previously reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies were reconstructed using filtered back-projection without attenuation or scatter correction and realigned along the heart axis. The left ventricle was divided into 16 segments [15]. Regional wall motion was assessed visually by consensus of two blinded experienced observers and scored using a four-point scale (1=normal, 2=hypokine-sis; 3=akinesis; 4=dyskinesis) [16].…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%