“…Examining these issues in detail is beyond the scope of this review; however, some of them are inescapable, as they are directly related to the process of diagnosing R. For instance, more than a dozen different definitions for AngR exist [2,17]. In the literature reviewed by us, AngR was determined as a âĄ50% diameter stenosis in 12 studies [7,8,28,31,34,35,41,50,51,53,54,57], âĄ70% diameter stenosis in four studies [42,44,52,58] and by other criteria (loss of gain) in four studies [16,45,55,56]. This topic is not the only one with such a high variability.…”