2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2021.103266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DOA estimation using sparse array with gain-phase error based on a novel atomic norm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the real environment, there are many non-ideal factors such as gain and phase error [11], mutual coupling error [12], etc., which lead to the deviation between the actual steering vector and the ideal steering vector of the received signal [13]. This deviation seriously affects the accuracy of DOA estimation [14], and consequently, the performance of the above algorithms is seriously affected [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the real environment, there are many non-ideal factors such as gain and phase error [11], mutual coupling error [12], etc., which lead to the deviation between the actual steering vector and the ideal steering vector of the received signal [13]. This deviation seriously affects the accuracy of DOA estimation [14], and consequently, the performance of the above algorithms is seriously affected [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This coherence engenders rank deficiency in the noise-free correlation matrix of the received signals [1], which contrasts with the situation involving incoherent signals, thus rendering high-resolution subspace algorithms [1] originally intended for the latter ineffective in multipath scenarios. Spatial smoothing, as elucidated in [3,4], has become the prevalent approach to DOA estimation for coherent signals. It encompasses segmenting the array into overlapping sub-arrays and averaging [1] their covariance matrices [1] to alleviate the rank deficiency issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in practical engineering applications, it is not easy to ensure the existence of calibration sources, so it is not suitable for practical engineering applications. However, self-calibration methods can directly estimate the gain-phase error during array operation without placing the pre-calibration source [25][26][27]. Although these methods usually adopt iterative methods and require a large amount of computation, compared with precalibration methods, it is more likely to be implemented in actual engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%