2018 15th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communications (WPNC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/wpnc.2018.8555814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DOA Estimation of Two Targets with Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of the training data increases exponentially (does not scale). We should note that this is not a limitation of the proposed CNN only but rather a challenge that most DL-based approaches face, due to the need to perform exhaustive training [19], [21], [22]. In addition, under the particular scenario of low SNR, estimation of N −1 is not very accurate even for standard methods such as MUSIC, EPSRIT and R-MUSIC.…”
Section: B Mixed Number Of Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size of the training data increases exponentially (does not scale). We should note that this is not a limitation of the proposed CNN only but rather a challenge that most DL-based approaches face, due to the need to perform exhaustive training [19], [21], [22]. In addition, under the particular scenario of low SNR, estimation of N −1 is not very accurate even for standard methods such as MUSIC, EPSRIT and R-MUSIC.…”
Section: B Mixed Number Of Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…DL-based methods enjoy several advantages over optimization-based ones: a) after training the network no optimization is required and the solution is the result of simple operations (multiplications and additions); b) they do not require any specific tuning of parameters, in contrast to optimization-based techniques, whose solution strongly depends on the tuning of those parameters, and c) they demonstrate resilience to data imperfections, e.g., using fewer snapshots, performing well in low SNR. A deep neural network (DNN) with fully connected (FC) layers was employed in [19] for DoA classification of two targets using the signal covariance matrix. However, the reported results indicate poor DoA estimation results in high SNR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique exhibits good adaptation to array imperfections and enhance enhance generalization to unseen cases. Kase et al [21] employed deep learning to estimate DoA and evaluates the performance in the for two narrowband signals incident on linear array. Deep neural network shows appreciable estimation accuracy.…”
Section: C) Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep neural network shows appreciable estimation accuracy. The deep learning formulated for a particular case exhibits very high success rate in the same case [21]. Wan et al [22] proposed a deep learning based autonomous vehicle super resolution DoA estimation for safety driving.…”
Section: C) Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two formats of data are used in the process: the raw radar data cube and the statistical average in the form of covariance matrices. Simulation and experiment results are provided to demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed method over conventional methods such MUSIC as well as emerging deep learning methods [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. It has been claimed, based on simulation results, that neural networks (NNs) can outperform MUSIC when SNRs are relatively low; however, no convincing experimental results have been shown to support the claims [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], and the angular differences between targets are not small enough to show the supremacy of deep-learning-based methods [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%