2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13638-018-1324-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DOA estimation for far-field sources in mixed signals with mutual coupling and gain-phase error array

Abstract: Mutual coupling and gain-phase errors are very common in sensor channels for array signal processing, and they have serious impacts on the performance of most algorithms, especially in practical applications. Therefore, a new approach for direction of arrival (DOA) estimation of far-field sources in mixed far-field and near-field signals in the presence of mutual coupling and gain-phase imperfections is addressed. First, the model of received data with two kinds of array errors is founded. Then matrix transfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results in this work show that STCA can achieve better performance than other symmetric nested arrays under the same array sensors and MC effects. In [227], an effective approach to resolve FFSs in mixed signals (FM) using SULA is presented, which in addition to considering MC effects, gain/phase imperfections are also addressed. The issue of array gain/phase uncertainties for mixed sources is also addressed in [228].…”
Section: E the Effect Of Antenna Mutual Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation results in this work show that STCA can achieve better performance than other symmetric nested arrays under the same array sensors and MC effects. In [227], an effective approach to resolve FFSs in mixed signals (FM) using SULA is presented, which in addition to considering MC effects, gain/phase imperfections are also addressed. The issue of array gain/phase uncertainties for mixed sources is also addressed in [228].…”
Section: E the Effect Of Antenna Mutual Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, conventional calibration methods lack adaptability and are challenging to model accurately [35][36][37]. CNN-based methods are data-driven, and therefore they do not require prior assumptions about array imperfections.…”
Section: Array Imperfections and Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%