Do you need to pay for quality care? Associations between bribes and out-of-pocket expenditures on quality of care during childbirth in India

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>While it is mandated that reproductive and child health services be provided for free at public facilities in India, qualitative evidence suggests it is common for facilities to request bribes and other informal payments for medicines, medical tests or equipment. This article examines the prevalence of bribe requests, total out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPEs) and associations between bribe requests and total OOPEs on the experience of quality of care and maternal complications during childbirth. Women who delivered in public facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India were administered a survey on sociodemographic characteristics, bribe requests, total OOPEs, types of health checks received and experience of maternal complications. Data were analysed using descriptive, bivariate and multivariate statistics. Among the 2018 women who completed the survey, 43% were asked to pay a bribe and 73% incurred OOPEs. Bribe requests were associated with lower odds of receiving all health checks upon arrival to the facility (aOR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.24–0.98) and during labour and delivery (aOR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.25–0.76), lower odds of receiving most or all health checks after delivery (aOR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.31–0.62) and higher odds of experiencing maternal complications (aOR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.13–1.87). Although it is mandated that maternity care be provided for free in public facilities in India, these findings suggest that OOPEs are high, and bribes/tips contribute significantly. Interventions centred on improving person-centred care (particularly guidelines around bribes), health system conditions and women’s expectations of care are needed.</jats:p>

The economic toll of COVID‐19: A cohort study of prevalence and economic factors associated with postpartum depression in Kenya

“…Even small costs may deter women from receiving quality care, decrease person‐centered care, and potentially add barriers for women to access healthcare facilities in the future either for herself or her newborn. 10 Reporting a required payment for PPE during labor/delivery and postnatal visits was associated with PPD; however, in models where all economic indicators were included in the model, only paying for PPE during postnatal visits was associated with PPD. One potential explanation for this association may lie in the fact that postnatal visits are typically completely free, in contrast to deliveries, which often require purchase of extraneous items (razor, cotton wool, etc); thus, PPE during labor/delivery represented an expected, and therefore acceptable, cost.…”

A comparison of intensive vs. light-touch quality improvement interventions for maternal health in Uttar Pradesh, India

“…Our own past research has shown that as providers become overworked and service volumes increase, better clinical care is often at odds with better, more personal, care [30]. Provider stress, and facility management, were shown to be critical contextual pre-conditions for being open to improvement, and anecdotally reported by research teams for this study as well [31]. In this context, our findings are particularly important.…”

Understanding disparities in person-centred maternity care: the potential role of provider implicit and explicit bias

“…Studies on drivers of poor PCMC suggest providers treat women differently based on women's appearance, assumptions of women's expectations and level of understanding, and women's ability to advocate for themselves (Afulani et al, 2020a,b;Smith et al, 2020). Others have highlighted the role of women's ability to pay for services including bribes (Warren et al, 2017;Landrian et al, 2020). However, understanding disparities was not the primary goal of these studies, and its drivers were not explored in detail.…”