2022
DOI: 10.1142/s0219877022500195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do You Feel It? The Relationship Between the Perceived Team Climate for Innovations and the Experience of Flow and Worry

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between the perceived team climate for innovations and the experience of flow and worry and the moderating effect of team size. The research contains a multi-organization dataset with 323 software product development team members. The results show that the perceived climate for innovation is significantly positively related to the experience of flow and worry. However, the findings did not support the moderation with no differences in working in smaller or larger teams. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although ways of improving the work environment have been addressed in flow research, the importance of interpersonal and social factors as flow inhibitors has been overlooked (Csikszentmihalyi et al , 2017). Apart from Aichroth et al (2022), who found that the perceived team climate could affect individual flow in development teams either positively or negatively, most studies on interpersonal factors or collective flow have focused on the facilitators of flow (Salanova et al , 2014). The findings of the present study demonstrated that an unsupportive or even toxic climate at work could be a barrier to flow, whether caused by problematic interactions with management, the team or clients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although ways of improving the work environment have been addressed in flow research, the importance of interpersonal and social factors as flow inhibitors has been overlooked (Csikszentmihalyi et al , 2017). Apart from Aichroth et al (2022), who found that the perceived team climate could affect individual flow in development teams either positively or negatively, most studies on interpersonal factors or collective flow have focused on the facilitators of flow (Salanova et al , 2014). The findings of the present study demonstrated that an unsupportive or even toxic climate at work could be a barrier to flow, whether caused by problematic interactions with management, the team or clients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the personal-level factors could be more important than the situational factors for facilitating flow). Interpersonal factors could be investigated further by focusing on the role of management, team dynamics and communication skills in being able to experience flow at work, as well as how collective flow (Aichroth et al , 2022; Salanova et al , 2014), could be facilitated by balancing teamwork and meetings so that they allow sufficient time blocks for focused work and reaching flow. Given these points, the findings of this study provide many avenues for future research on flow in software development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation