2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-4120-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do we need ARDS?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to patients who survived at the hospital discharge, those who died were more likely to have an aMDA-5 autoantibody ( n = 16/24, 67% vs. n = 3/23, 13%; p = 0.001), had a higher rate of ground-glass attenuation ( n = 22/24, 92% vs. 15/23, 65%; p = 0.04) and a lower rate of alveolar condensation ( n = 14/24, 58% vs. 21/23, 91%; p = 0.02) on chest CT scan, and were given 3 [ 2 , 3 ] versus 2 [ 1 , 2 ] different immunosuppressive regimens during the ICU stay ( p = 0.002) (Table 4 ). After adjustment on syndrome (anti-synthetase or aMDA-5 dermato-pulmonary syndrome), the presence of ground-glass attenuations on chest CT scan was no longer associated with in-hospital mortality ( p = 0.24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to patients who survived at the hospital discharge, those who died were more likely to have an aMDA-5 autoantibody ( n = 16/24, 67% vs. n = 3/23, 13%; p = 0.001), had a higher rate of ground-glass attenuation ( n = 22/24, 92% vs. 15/23, 65%; p = 0.04) and a lower rate of alveolar condensation ( n = 14/24, 58% vs. 21/23, 91%; p = 0.02) on chest CT scan, and were given 3 [ 2 , 3 ] versus 2 [ 1 , 2 ] different immunosuppressive regimens during the ICU stay ( p = 0.002) (Table 4 ). After adjustment on syndrome (anti-synthetase or aMDA-5 dermato-pulmonary syndrome), the presence of ground-glass attenuations on chest CT scan was no longer associated with in-hospital mortality ( p = 0.24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying the cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a crucial step for initiating a targeted treatment and improving prognosis [ 1 , 2 ]. However, two recent studies [ 3 , 4 ] showed that 8% of patients with ARDS according to the Berlin criteria [ 5 ] lacked exposure to “common” risk factors (e.g., pneumonia, acute pancreatitis, aspiration of gastric content or extra-pulmonary sepsis) with no etiology eventually retrieved in 80% of them [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, future definitions may specify biologically distinct ARDS subphenotypes, identified via shared underlying precipitating factor(s), common respiratory physiology, or biomarker panels of alveolar epithelial and pulmonary vascular endothelial injury and inflammation [1113]. The tension between generalizability and performance of future definitions will remain but may ease as diagnostics become more affordable and accessible over time.…”
Section: Redefining Ards Againmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cumulative data have suggested that ARDS is a heterogeneous syndrome with diverse radiographic lung morphology, respiratory mechanics and biomarker pro les [8,9]. The heterogeneity of ARDS may explain the negative results observed in many clinical trials [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%