2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do we measure leadership effectively? Articulating and evaluating scale development psychometrics for best practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…43 Conversely, if a pharmacy-centric instrument is desired, a collection of best practices for developing valid and reliable assessments of leadership has been published. 44 Importantly, efforts to identify instruments for assessing leadership should clarify whether the intent is to measure leadership emergence or effectiveness. Leadership emergence measures the ability for an individual to rise to the top of an organization but does not necessarily correlate with leadership effectiveness (ie, the leader's impact on organizational performance).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 Conversely, if a pharmacy-centric instrument is desired, a collection of best practices for developing valid and reliable assessments of leadership has been published. 44 Importantly, efforts to identify instruments for assessing leadership should clarify whether the intent is to measure leadership emergence or effectiveness. Leadership emergence measures the ability for an individual to rise to the top of an organization but does not necessarily correlate with leadership effectiveness (ie, the leader's impact on organizational performance).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ALBI was developed to assess the five behaviours of an authentic leader (Crawford et al, 2020): awareness, sincerity, balanced processing, positive morals, and informal influence. The development of the tool was conducted among a diverse sample exceeding 1,000 participants, and applying rigorous psychometric analysis (Crawford & Kelder, 2019). The scale consists of 15 items assessing these behaviours on a 7-point Likert scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the use of post-hoc accounts for leadership studies has been criticised since at least the 1970s and more recently these criticisms have been extensively developed (Antonakis et al, 2016; Clifton and Dai, 2020). Particularly, the role of social cognition, including prototyping (Lord and Shondrick, 2011), attribution (Martinko et al, 2007), and performance cue effects (Lord et al, 1978) in producing, what on the surface look like reports of observations of leadership, has been clarified and more broadly acknowledged (Crawford and Kelder, 2019). This literature suggests that post-hoc accounts of leadership actions and interactions are constituted as much by observer characteristics (such as expectancies, knowledge categories, preferences etc.)…”
Section: Challenges and Advantages Of Studying Leadership In Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%