2010
DOI: 10.1080/17588920903388950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action?

Abstract: The perception-action model proposes that vision-for-perception and vision-for-action are based on anatomically distinct and functionally independent streams within the visual cortex. This idea can account for diverse experimental findings, and has been hugely influential over the past two decades. The model itself comprises a set of core contrasts between the functional properties of the two visual streams. We critically review the evidence for these contrasts, arguing that each of them has either been refute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
177
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
4
177
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet apraxic patients have shown appropriate memory-driven reach and grasp movements believed to be reliant on the integration of ventral and dorsal processes (Ietswaart, Carey, Della Sala, & Dijkhuizen, 2001). However, the reliance of memory-driven reach and grasp movements on cross-talk between the two visual pathways has since been questioned; the dorsal stream is believed to play a dominant role in both immediate and delayed action, whilst the role of the ventral stream increases with extended delay of movement onset (Schenk & McIntosh, 2010). Appropriate memory-driven grasping in these patients could therefore be attributable to sufficient information remaining present in the dorsal stream.…”
Section: * Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet apraxic patients have shown appropriate memory-driven reach and grasp movements believed to be reliant on the integration of ventral and dorsal processes (Ietswaart, Carey, Della Sala, & Dijkhuizen, 2001). However, the reliance of memory-driven reach and grasp movements on cross-talk between the two visual pathways has since been questioned; the dorsal stream is believed to play a dominant role in both immediate and delayed action, whilst the role of the ventral stream increases with extended delay of movement onset (Schenk & McIntosh, 2010). Appropriate memory-driven grasping in these patients could therefore be attributable to sufficient information remaining present in the dorsal stream.…”
Section: * Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there have been a number of demonstrations of the involvement of 21 Delay in spatial priming the dorsal stream in delayed action (for a review see Ref. [9]) which suggests that the visual information used for action-guidance, presumably egocentric in nature, is not as transient as was originally claimed. Furthermore, while the differential effects of visual illusions on delayed and immediate motor performance have been taken as evidence that the ventral stream is being used after a delay, it has also been found that the availability of visual feedback may instead explain the differences between immediate and delayed performance [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such it is argued that visuomotor performance depends on the use of egocentric representations [8]; [9]; [10] ; [11]. This current study assesses the claim that egocentric coding leads to very short-lived representations and that these representations are less persistent than those used in allocentric coding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This suggests that the ventral stream is not just critical for allocentric (Schenk 2006) but also for egocentric coding. On the basis of these assumptions we could explain why persistent egocentric representations are found in healthy participants, and this set of Egocentric representations are most often thought of with regard to motor tasks (Westwood et al 2001;Witt et al 2008;Schenk and McIntosh 2010). Therefore, how is using a perceptual task here to investigate the temporal persistence of egocentric information relevant to the real time visuomotor hypothesis?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%