2007
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00576.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do vasoregulatory mechanisms in exercising human muscle compensate for changes in arterial perfusion pressure?

Abstract: We tested the hypothesis that vasoregulatory mechanisms completely counteract the effects of sudden changes in arterial perfusion pressure on exercising muscle blood flow. Twelve healthy young subjects (7 female, 5 male) lay supine and performed rhythmic isometric handgrip contractions (2 s contraction/ 2 s relaxation 30% maximal voluntary contraction). Forearm blood flow (FBF; echo and Doppler ultrasound), mean arterial blood pressure (arterial tonometry), and heart rate (ECG) were measured. Moving the arm be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
46
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient of variation within subjects across the five measurements ranged from 1.36% to 1.8%. A lack of change in a conduit vessel that is exposed to differences in hydrostatic pressure and in brief elevations in shear is a common finding in our laboratory and others (6,51). Subjects were then instrumented for measurement of heart rate (HR; ECG electrodes in standard CM 5 placement), beat-by-beat arterial blood pressure (finger photoplethysmograph cuff on the middle finger of the left hand supported in a sling at heart level; Finometer MIDI; Finapres Medical Systems, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and right CFA blood velocity (pulsed Doppler ultrasound, Model 500V TCD; Multigon Industries, Mt.…”
Section: General Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coefficient of variation within subjects across the five measurements ranged from 1.36% to 1.8%. A lack of change in a conduit vessel that is exposed to differences in hydrostatic pressure and in brief elevations in shear is a common finding in our laboratory and others (6,51). Subjects were then instrumented for measurement of heart rate (HR; ECG electrodes in standard CM 5 placement), beat-by-beat arterial blood pressure (finger photoplethysmograph cuff on the middle finger of the left hand supported in a sling at heart level; Finometer MIDI; Finapres Medical Systems, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and right CFA blood velocity (pulsed Doppler ultrasound, Model 500V TCD; Multigon Industries, Mt.…”
Section: General Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Mechanisms that elevate the pressure gradient for blood flow through the CFA supplied vascular bed (37,47) could include the reduction of venous pressure by the muscle pump (25) and the restoration of arterial hydrostatic pressure in the lower limbs upon standing (37). Mechanisms that increase resistance vessel caliber could include local vasodilator substances (8), mechanical vessel compression effects on vascular tone (9), and possibly resistance vessel mechanical distension via increased local hydrostatic pressure upon standing (51).…”
Section: Mechanisms Localized To the Lower Limbs Explain Ioh On Risinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Walker et al (40), using a forearm occlusion model, found that changing arm position from the above heart to below heart position during isometric handgrip contraction rapidly increased both perfusion pressure and forearm vascular conductance. Taken together, the results of these studies and the current study indicate that changes in body position which alter perfusion pressure also alter limb vascular conductance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous experiments in humans in which changes in body position were used to alter femoral artery perfusion pressure during passive leg movement (13,33) indicate that altered perfusion pressure changes both leg blood flow and vascular conductance independent of muscle contraction. Additionally, changing arm position during muscle contractions caused a change in fore-arm vascular conductance that was attributed to vascular smooth muscle myogenic responses because it was independent of changes in muscle contraction or metabolism (40). Thus, the primary goal of the current experiments was to apply a standardized vascular occlusion stimulus (to elicit reactive hyperemia) with the arm positioned above or below the heart.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is surprising if we consider that the first observation of the phenomenon by Sir William Bayliss was in fact a rapid blood flow increase in the hindlimbs in response to a brief occlusion of the abdominal aorta (3). The existence of a rapid myogenic constriction (28,29,49) and dilatation (5, 38) has then been documented in different preparations.…”
Section: The Rapid Hyperemic Response To Brief Spontaneous Contractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%