2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00478.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do two heads search better than one? Effects of student collaboration on web search behaviour and search outcomes

Abstract: This study compared Pairs of students with Single students in web search tasks. The underlying hypothesis was that peer-to-peer collaboration encourages students to articulate their thoughts, which in turn has a facilitative effect on the regulation of the search process as well as search outcomes. Both hypotheses were supported by the results. Pairs located the target information more often and in less time than Singles did. Pairs also employed a richer repertoire of search strategies and were more proficient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
47
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it has been noted that in educational contexts, information seeking often involves some form of collaboration and dialogue, and that this interaction is an important research site (Ellis et al, 2002;Foster, 2009). In parallel, in the education and learning literature such collaboration has been flagged as a possible means to improve self-regulation and overcome an 'inert knowledge problem' in which students fail to articulate what they know, to successfully solve search challenges (Lazonder, 2005). In that work, with 40 students (M = 20 years old), those collaborating were faster and (marginally) more evaluative than those searching individually.…”
Section: Information Seeking Credibility Assessment Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it has been noted that in educational contexts, information seeking often involves some form of collaboration and dialogue, and that this interaction is an important research site (Ellis et al, 2002;Foster, 2009). In parallel, in the education and learning literature such collaboration has been flagged as a possible means to improve self-regulation and overcome an 'inert knowledge problem' in which students fail to articulate what they know, to successfully solve search challenges (Lazonder, 2005). In that work, with 40 students (M = 20 years old), those collaborating were faster and (marginally) more evaluative than those searching individually.…”
Section: Information Seeking Credibility Assessment Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by De Vries (this issue) the collaborative nature of the instruction was one of the reasons why sub skills 'formulate questions' and 'activate prior knowledge' improved. Collaboration also has a positive influence on regulation (Lazonder, 2005), one of the problematic areas in IPS. So a combination of individual and collaborative assignment seems a good instructional strategy.…”
Section: Information Problem Solving 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytics tools in socio-cultural approaches encourage learners to reflect on their own activity, in an attempt to understand how they can develop their skills in information processing, in their own particular contexts. Analytics within this approach might attend particularly to quality of discourse for learning, for creating a mutuality of perspectives (Edwards & Mercer, 1987) including in collaborative information seeking tasks (Foster, 2009;Hertzum, 2008;Lazonder, 2005). Our previous work is in this tradition, drawing on socio-cultural discourse analysis (Mercer & Littleton, 2007), and emerging conceptions of the pragmatic web (Buckingham Shum, 2006).…”
Section: Pragmatic Socio-cultural Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%