Abstract:The increasing ethnic heterogeneity that many societies are experiencing could be interpreted as a detrimental phenomenon, since empirical literature exists that indicates that higher levels of ethnic fractionalization induce higher levels of corruption. This paper aims to show the role of tolerance in overcoming this harmful effect of ethnic heterogeneity. To this end, a sample of 86 countries is tested for a positive association between ethnic fractionalization and corruption. It is then shown that tolerance… Show more
“…More precisely, we stress the role of social cohesion. Unlike Buitrago et al [10], who focus on tolerance, and Van Staveren and Pervaiz [9], who stress the inclusion of minorities, we point out that education promotes all these values and constitutes the key element for handling diversity and obtaining all its benefits. Therefore, our hypothesis is that diversity is negatively correlated with the level of income per capita when education is absent, but positively correlated when education is present.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Tolerance, trust, and cooperation among groups contribute towards social cohesion through the avoidance, or at least the mitigation, of the potential conflicts that could arise from diversity. Based on this argument, Buitrago et al [10] consider that social cohesion could be achieved in a heterogeneous society through tolerance, which might help the integration of all members of a community, thereby overcoming any friction caused by heterogeneity. In the same vein, we argue that education contributes towards social cohesion since it provides the instruments to become more tolerant, cooperative, and trusting; it facilitates social networks [12]; and it reduces the cultural distances between ethnic groups [11].…”
Section: The Effects Of Ethnolinguistic Diversity and The Role Of Social Cohesion A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to answer this question, Van Staveren and Pervaiz [9] point out that social cohesion plays a key role in gaining all the benefits from diversity. Along these lines, Buitrago et al Buitrago et al [10] show that tolerance overcomes the negative effects of ethnolinguistic diversity on institutional quality.…”
The many growing migratory flows render our societies increasingly heterogeneous. From the point of view of social welfare, achieving all the positive effects of diversity appears as a challenge for our societies. Nevertheless, while it is true that ethnolinguistic diversity involves costs and benefits, at a country level it seems that the former are greater than the latter, even more so when income inequality between ethnic groups is taken into account. In this respect, there is a vast literature at a macro level that shows that ethnolinguistic fragmentation induces lower income, which leads to the conclusion that part of the difference in income observed between countries can be attributed to their different levels of fragmentation. This paper presents primary evidence of the role of education in mitigating the adverse effects of ethnolinguistic fractionalization on the level of income. While the results show a negative association between fragmentation and income for all indices of diversity, the attainment of a certain level of education, especially secondary and tertiary, manages to reverse the sign of the marginal effect of ethnolinguistic fractionalization on income level. Since current societies are increasingly diverse, these results could have major economic policy implications.
“…More precisely, we stress the role of social cohesion. Unlike Buitrago et al [10], who focus on tolerance, and Van Staveren and Pervaiz [9], who stress the inclusion of minorities, we point out that education promotes all these values and constitutes the key element for handling diversity and obtaining all its benefits. Therefore, our hypothesis is that diversity is negatively correlated with the level of income per capita when education is absent, but positively correlated when education is present.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Tolerance, trust, and cooperation among groups contribute towards social cohesion through the avoidance, or at least the mitigation, of the potential conflicts that could arise from diversity. Based on this argument, Buitrago et al [10] consider that social cohesion could be achieved in a heterogeneous society through tolerance, which might help the integration of all members of a community, thereby overcoming any friction caused by heterogeneity. In the same vein, we argue that education contributes towards social cohesion since it provides the instruments to become more tolerant, cooperative, and trusting; it facilitates social networks [12]; and it reduces the cultural distances between ethnic groups [11].…”
Section: The Effects Of Ethnolinguistic Diversity and The Role Of Social Cohesion A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to answer this question, Van Staveren and Pervaiz [9] point out that social cohesion plays a key role in gaining all the benefits from diversity. Along these lines, Buitrago et al Buitrago et al [10] show that tolerance overcomes the negative effects of ethnolinguistic diversity on institutional quality.…”
The many growing migratory flows render our societies increasingly heterogeneous. From the point of view of social welfare, achieving all the positive effects of diversity appears as a challenge for our societies. Nevertheless, while it is true that ethnolinguistic diversity involves costs and benefits, at a country level it seems that the former are greater than the latter, even more so when income inequality between ethnic groups is taken into account. In this respect, there is a vast literature at a macro level that shows that ethnolinguistic fragmentation induces lower income, which leads to the conclusion that part of the difference in income observed between countries can be attributed to their different levels of fragmentation. This paper presents primary evidence of the role of education in mitigating the adverse effects of ethnolinguistic fractionalization on the level of income. While the results show a negative association between fragmentation and income for all indices of diversity, the attainment of a certain level of education, especially secondary and tertiary, manages to reverse the sign of the marginal effect of ethnolinguistic fractionalization on income level. Since current societies are increasingly diverse, these results could have major economic policy implications.
“…Nowadays, these ideas for analysing and regulating income distribution are fundamental for the studies of living standards and economic processes caused by their changes. In particular, the noted studies analyse the links between income distribution and economic growth [20], including investment flows [21][22][23], income inequality, and current account imbalances [24,25]; indirect impact of some specific factors on income inequality [26][27][28], particularly tolerance for corruption [29]. Baradas and Lagoa [30] also investigate new trends in globalisation, including changes in education and business cycles, within the framework of the analysis of the impact of the financialization process on the labour force share in Gross domestic product (GDP) due to its impact on government activity and trade union density.…”
Income distribution can cause large-scale transformations in human resources structure, essential changes of economic outputs via its impact on life satisfaction and motivation of work. Thus, the overall objective of this research is to improve methodological tools of income distribution analysis based on identifying the links between different structural indicators of income inequality and the most essential features of social and economic well-being. We conducted comparative analysis of EU Member States and Ukraine. We used structural analysis based on two forms of income distribution—functional (share of “labour” in Gross domestic product - GDP) and household one (ratio of incomes measured by special decile coefficients) to identify income inequality and inconsistencies in distributive strategies. By grouping European countries according to economic well-being (described as GDP per capita) and inequality in income distribution (based on Gini coefficient), we determined apparent tendencies in distributive policies and revealed links between income distribution and connected social-economic features of well-being. We conclude that countries with the most stable and clear patterns in income distribution have distinct connections between the share of labour costs in GDP and successes in social and economic spheres, including human development level, property rights protection, GDP growth, possibilities for taxation and budgeting of social programmes.
“…Van Staveren and Pervaiz (2017) stress social cohesion as a tool to handle diversity successfully. In this vein, Buitrago et al (2019) highlight tolerance as a key issue in achieving social cohesion in an ethnically diverse society, since it contributes to the integration of all members of a community, which helps overcome frictions caused by diversity. Likewise, Caraballo and Buitrago (2019) point out the decisive role of education in promoting social cohesion since it facilitates social networks and fosters tolerance and cooperativeness.…”
Over recent decades, the growing research on social diversity at country level has striven to explain several outcomes such as the differences in income across countries and the origins of civil conflicts. The literature employs a wide range of indices to measure social diversity that hinders the comparison of the results with respect to their effects on socio‐economic performance. This paper intends to disentangle such a variety of indices and their applications. To achieve this goal, we have collected the social diversity indices used in cross‐country studies, and have ascertained not only their similarities and differences, and the relationships between them, but also their main applications. Studies at country level have been selected that construct their own indices and that make their databases available. We show that the dimension and the index chosen to measure social diversity, the level of disaggregation of the social groups, and the geographical unit of analysis explain the tangle of indices and the mixed results achieved by the literature focused on socio‐economic outcomes of social diversity. This paper enables the suitable evaluation and comparison of the effects of social diversity and the selection of the appropriate index depending on the analysis to be carried out.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.