2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.cccn.2003.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do tissue damage biomarkers used to assess machine-perfused NHBD kidneys predict long-term renal function post-transplant?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, PP of kidneys is considered to function through stabilization of the organ by supplying nutrients and oxygen during storage, by decreasing intrarenal vasospasm and by removal of waste materials while mimicking circulation and increasing vascular compliance. Numerous diagnostic procedures and perfusate modifications have been introduced for PP throughout its evolution (21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Despite the abundance of literature examining these issues and novel technical methodologies, opinions regarding the ultimate efficacy of PP are mixed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, PP of kidneys is considered to function through stabilization of the organ by supplying nutrients and oxygen during storage, by decreasing intrarenal vasospasm and by removal of waste materials while mimicking circulation and increasing vascular compliance. Numerous diagnostic procedures and perfusate modifications have been introduced for PP throughout its evolution (21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Despite the abundance of literature examining these issues and novel technical methodologies, opinions regarding the ultimate efficacy of PP are mixed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None were predictive of graft survival [20]. Gok et al found similar results for GST levels and graft survival [29]. PFI therefore appears unique in its ability to predict survival, however this needs to be validated in a second cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this context, the evaluation of non-invasive kidney injury biomarkers from perfusate solution could add a greater predictive value to kidney viability and allograft outcomes as concede assessment at multiple time points during preservation. Moers et al (47) have investigated for the first time six important perfusate biomarkers that have been supported in different studies and are already in use by various transplant centres (48)(49)(50)(51)(52). These biomarkers are; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), total glutathione-S-transferase (GST), alanine-aminopeptidase (Ala-AP), N-acetyl-β-Dglucosaminidase (NAG), and heart type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP).…”
Section: Perfusate Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%