2008
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200800570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do the Local Softness and Hardness Indicate the Softest and Hardest Regions of a Molecule?

Abstract: In this work, we will show that the largest values of the local softness and hardness do not necessarily correspond to the softest and hardest regions of the molecule, respectively. Based on our results, we will argue that it is more useful to interpret the local softness and the local hardness as functions that measure the "local abundance" or "concentration" of the corresponding global properties. This new point of view helps reveal how and when these local reactivity indices are most useful.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(174 reference statements)
4
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(It is important to emphasize that the function which correctly describes the local softness can be taken to be sðr * Þ ¼ Sf ðr * Þ only for soft systems. 22,23 ) Eqn (25) shows a kind of inverse relationship between local hardness and local softness, in accordance with intuitive expectations, since on the pointwise behavior of local softness (i.e. of the derivative of the density with respect to N), the pointwise behavior of the density does not have a direct effect.…”
Section: Local Hardness Through a Local Chemical Potentialsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…(It is important to emphasize that the function which correctly describes the local softness can be taken to be sðr * Þ ¼ Sf ðr * Þ only for soft systems. 22,23 ) Eqn (25) shows a kind of inverse relationship between local hardness and local softness, in accordance with intuitive expectations, since on the pointwise behavior of local softness (i.e. of the derivative of the density with respect to N), the pointwise behavior of the density does not have a direct effect.…”
Section: Local Hardness Through a Local Chemical Potentialsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…An analysis of local electrophilicity (ω k + ) provides the information of a particular atomic site in a molecule being attacked by a nucleophile. This local property has been proposed as a better intermolecular reactivity index than the Fukui function itself for analyzing electrophile-nucleophile interactions becuase the Fukui function allows to compare the sites selectivity within a molecule, while for a comparison of the reactivity of a specific site on different molecules, it is more appropriate to use a property that includes intrinsic information of the systems studied [19][20][21][22]. In this context, the local softness and the local electrophilicity descriptors are suitable to explain hard-soft and electrophile-nucleophile interactions, respectively.…”
Section: Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contribution focuses on the structure and properties of the MPR 3 + fragments by reactivity indices as introduced through conceptual density functional theory (CDFT) [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The E dye is calculated by two approaches: a first level, applying molecular orbitals eigenvalues on the basis of Koopmans' theorem as IP ≈ -E HOMO [59]. This is accepted in the literature within the framework of the Conceptual Density Functional Theory (CDFT) [60,61]. A second level, the energy of the orbital that generates the transition in the band.…”
Section: Absorption Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%