1999
DOI: 10.1177/0961463x99008002005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Technologies have Time?

Abstract: This article explores the idea that certain temporalities of technology relate to temporalities embodied in different social practices. Our interest focuses on practices that do not seek a priori to domesticate time but rather seek to come to terms with it. Sociological analysis can no longer assume that technological artifacts incorporate functional time demands that determine unequivocally the uses of time. Instead it is concrete practices that generate those qualities of technology that we usually tend to g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous perspectives have attempted to describe the current temporal conditions and how these conditions endure through practices or technologies. A few in-depth reviews do exist on approaches to time and society by Adams (1990Adams ( , 2006, Abbott (2001), May and Thrift (2001), Brose (2004) and Hörn ing, Ahrens and Gerhard (1999). These approaches include questions about democracy and time (Connolly, 2002;Rosa, 2003;Scheuerman, 2004;Wolin, 1997), geography (May & Thrift, 2001, sociology (Adam, 1990;Castells, 1996), media studies (Hassan & Purser, 2007), queer theory (Dinshaw et al, 2007;Freeman, 2010) and science and technology studies (Edwards, 2003;Wajcman, 2008).…”
Section: Times Of Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous perspectives have attempted to describe the current temporal conditions and how these conditions endure through practices or technologies. A few in-depth reviews do exist on approaches to time and society by Adams (1990Adams ( , 2006, Abbott (2001), May and Thrift (2001), Brose (2004) and Hörn ing, Ahrens and Gerhard (1999). These approaches include questions about democracy and time (Connolly, 2002;Rosa, 2003;Scheuerman, 2004;Wolin, 1997), geography (May & Thrift, 2001, sociology (Adam, 1990;Castells, 1996), media studies (Hassan & Purser, 2007), queer theory (Dinshaw et al, 2007;Freeman, 2010) and science and technology studies (Edwards, 2003;Wajcman, 2008).…”
Section: Times Of Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aspiration to create periods of quality time points to a reflexive consciousness of scarce time budgets and an ambition to exploit the share of available time, guided by social or personal preferences. In the interviews and posts, we encountered an intention to “utilize the time which they have gained as a result of the flexibilization of their working time for the purpose of initiating a process of time management, and thus of self-management,” as Hörning et al (1999: viii) put it. This reflexivity engenders, Adam (2003) postulates, the idea of a mastery of time and a control of temporal rhythms according to predefined values.…”
Section: Aspirations Of Reflexive Time Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is that, in highly technological contexts, individuals' movements are triggered, delayed and paced, not by notions of geographic distances nor by difficulties in localising routes, but by the perception that a schedule can be negotiated, meeting times can be squeezed, or that a place can be reached within a certain period of time. Technologies provoke multidimensional practices of time and new meanings of temporality [8], which consequently influence movement.…”
Section: Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%