2017
DOI: 10.1057/s41260-017-0054-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do target date mutual funds meet their targets?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk matching due to targeting different clienteles is not significant in explaining the return and allocation heterogeneity among funds with the same target retirement year. Within a different framework, Johnson & Yi (2017) use Sharpe and Treynor ratios to explore the performance of target date funds relative to a balanced fund. Their analysis is specific to funds with target years 2035-2050 and they find that TDFs do not outperform naïve strategies.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk matching due to targeting different clienteles is not significant in explaining the return and allocation heterogeneity among funds with the same target retirement year. Within a different framework, Johnson & Yi (2017) use Sharpe and Treynor ratios to explore the performance of target date funds relative to a balanced fund. Their analysis is specific to funds with target years 2035-2050 and they find that TDFs do not outperform naïve strategies.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this ambiguity, typical implementations of TDF strategies are often based on heuristics that are lacking consistency and optimality under a well-defined quantitative model. These often lead to inappropriate exposure to market risks for TDFs of different target dates and mixed investment outcomes, see Yoon (2010), Johnson and Yi (2017). To properly design the so-called "glide path" for the TDF, proper characterization of market risks and returns at different time horizons is essential, see Yoon (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%