2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do stormwater source control policies deliver the right hydrologic outcomes?

Abstract: International audienceThe number of stormwater source control (SC) regulations adopted by local authorities is rapidly growing in many countries. We can expect that, in the near future, the hydrologic behavior of many urban and periurban catchments will reflect this diffusion. This paper discusses SC regulations through two complementary approaches: starting on three French case-studies, it analyzes how regulations are developed today and identifies a set of shortcuts in policy-making practices. Then, the hydr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of modeling tools are available for optimizing the selection and siting of LID technologies so as to minimize flood risk, maximize human and ecosystem cobenefits, and stay within capital, maintenance, and operation costs. 90−92 These optimization schemes have several elements in common, including: (1) a spatially explicit (e.g., GIS-based) platform that includes information on the informal and formal drainage for a site and candidate locations for LID technologies; (2) a rainfall-runoff model that routes stormwater through the catchment; (3) an objective function that quantifies hydrologic performance (e.g., relative to stormwater harvest and infiltration targets, see Section 2) and costs of candidate LID configurations; and (4) an algorithm that identifies optimal solutions (e.g., by minimizing one or more objective functions) 51 96 Rainfall/runoff models can also be used to explore how a particular stormwater management strategy might impact receiving water quality. An example is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's study of the Illinois River (a multijurisdictional tributary of the Arkansas River in the states of Arkansas and Oklahoma) in which a catchment model based on Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran (HSPF) was calibrated for nutrients and the output linked to a hydrodynamic and water quality model for Lake Tenkiller.…”
Section: Optimizing Lid Selection At the Catchment Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of modeling tools are available for optimizing the selection and siting of LID technologies so as to minimize flood risk, maximize human and ecosystem cobenefits, and stay within capital, maintenance, and operation costs. 90−92 These optimization schemes have several elements in common, including: (1) a spatially explicit (e.g., GIS-based) platform that includes information on the informal and formal drainage for a site and candidate locations for LID technologies; (2) a rainfall-runoff model that routes stormwater through the catchment; (3) an objective function that quantifies hydrologic performance (e.g., relative to stormwater harvest and infiltration targets, see Section 2) and costs of candidate LID configurations; and (4) an algorithm that identifies optimal solutions (e.g., by minimizing one or more objective functions) 51 96 Rainfall/runoff models can also be used to explore how a particular stormwater management strategy might impact receiving water quality. An example is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's study of the Illinois River (a multijurisdictional tributary of the Arkansas River in the states of Arkansas and Oklahoma) in which a catchment model based on Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran (HSPF) was calibrated for nutrients and the output linked to a hydrodynamic and water quality model for Lake Tenkiller.…”
Section: Optimizing Lid Selection At the Catchment Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landschapskenmerken zijn van invloed op de wijze waarop regenwater zich gedraagt nadat het in de stedelijke waterkringloop is opgenomen. In verscheidene verstedelijkte gebieden in de wereld is door toepassing van watermanagementtechnieken voor het benutten van natuurlijke processen al een aanzienlijke vooruitgang geboekt [Backhaus et al, 2011;Dietz, 2007;Petrucci et al, 2013]. Deze worden vaak aangeduid als Low Impact Development (LID), Best Management Practices (BMP), Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) of, in het Frans, Techniques Alternatives.…”
Section: Inleidingunclassified
“…However, the quantitative analysis is usually extremely simplistic: it generally consists in determining the critical flow rate at one or several critical points of the sewer system, by calculating the admitted flow from upstream parcels by an inversion of the rational formula (Petrucci et al 2013).…”
Section: Flood Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban hydrologic models available today (e.g. the US EPA SWMM model; Rossmann 2004) are able to support design of source control facilities on small scales, but they require significant adaptations in order to study different urbanization scenarios under different stormwater management strategies at a large scale (Petrucci et al 2013, Versini et al 2013. Most local authorities do not have the resources to autonomously develop similar analyses: despite the understanding of source control that hydrologists may have, it is difficult to translate it in practice.…”
Section: Flood Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%