2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do State-Based Policies Have an Impact on Teen Birth Rates and Teen Abortion Rates in the United States?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This misinformation was felt to lead adolescents into falsely believing that condoms do not work, leaving them at greater risk of pregnancy and STIs (Weiser & Miller, 2010). The empirical evidence does not support the notion that AOE delays sexual initiation or reduces pregnancy and abortion rates (Chevrette & Abenhaim, 2015). On the contrary, the lack of information on safe sex, or Records excluded (n =497)…”
Section: Program Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This misinformation was felt to lead adolescents into falsely believing that condoms do not work, leaving them at greater risk of pregnancy and STIs (Weiser & Miller, 2010). The empirical evidence does not support the notion that AOE delays sexual initiation or reduces pregnancy and abortion rates (Chevrette & Abenhaim, 2015). On the contrary, the lack of information on safe sex, or Records excluded (n =497)…”
Section: Program Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To evaluate the efficacy of programs, researchers have examined teen sexual health outcomes (Jozkowski & Crawford, 2016). Three studies focused on teen birth or abortion rates to determine whether there was a difference between states that offered AOE compared to states that offered CSE (Chevrette & Abenhaim, 2015; Stanger-Hall & Hall, 2011; Yang & Gaydos, 2010). One study found no difference in teen birth or abortion rates based on policy, but two found increased teen birth rate in states that had AOE (Chevrette & Abenhaim, 2015; Stanger-Hall & Hall, 2011; Yang & Gaydos, 2010).…”
Section: Program Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two included studies [ 28 , 24 ] compared the impacts of parental consent and parental authorization and notification requirements (Supplementary Tables 4 and 5). Finally, one of the included studies considered the impacts of ‘spousal consent’ requirements [ 18 ] (Supplementary Tables 6 and 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some states place further restrictions on the use of private insurance to pay for abortion services. Studies comparing states across the country generally find that state-level restrictions on Medicaid are correlated with lower abortion rates in states that have such restrictions [39][40][41], and they contribute to individuals' resource constraints in seeking abortion services [42,43]. Research also suggests that abortion-related restrictions on public funding for family planning services are costly on a broader scale: without publicly-funded family planning services, states would be spending more than $1.2 billion annually in their Medicaid programs to cover the costs of unplanned births [44].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%