2002
DOI: 10.1207/s15327760jpfm0302_07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Speculative Stocks Lower Prices and Increase Volatility of Value Stocks?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finds additional empirical support by Haruvy and Noussair (), who show that increasing cash endowments ten‐fold leads to higher prices and greater mispricing, and Caginalp et al . (), who use a different market design yet obtain qualitatively similar results.…”
Section: Stylized Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finds additional empirical support by Haruvy and Noussair (), who show that increasing cash endowments ten‐fold leads to higher prices and greater mispricing, and Caginalp et al . (), who use a different market design yet obtain qualitatively similar results.…”
Section: Stylized Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Finally, Caginalp et al . () report that prices of their ‘value stock’ are depressed when there is the possibility to trade a ‘speculative stock’. Their results support a liquidity mechanic by which money invested in one asset suppresses the prices of the other.…”
Section: Stylized Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, our market has a large number of securities. Despite the mixed evidence with only two assets (see Ackert et al, 2006Ackert et al, , 2009Caginalp et al, 2002;Chan et al, 2013;Fisher and Kelly, 2000, for example), the overall direction of these previous results indicates that multiple assets tend to reduce overly exuberant pricing especially if the assets differ.…”
Section: Features Mitigating Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The returns of the two stocks were determined randomly. Draws were taken from two different distributions and the fundamental values of the stocks were always displayed to all subjects much like the setup in Caginalp et. al (2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%