2008
DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2008.84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do socioeconomic disparities affect accessing and keeping antihypertensive drug therapy? Evidence from an Italian population-based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two, economical and social factors (such as the size of the families) are also unlikely to be involved because in Italy, discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment does not appear to be related to patient income and household composition [46]. It is possible, on the contrary, that the greater prevalence of immigrants living in metropolitan areas plays a role because in this fraction of the population, treatment discontinuation has been shown to be greater [46]. We can also speculate that in rural areas, where the population density is low, it is easier for the patient to establish with the doctor a more regular and effective relationship with a favourable impact on treatment adherence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two, economical and social factors (such as the size of the families) are also unlikely to be involved because in Italy, discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment does not appear to be related to patient income and household composition [46]. It is possible, on the contrary, that the greater prevalence of immigrants living in metropolitan areas plays a role because in this fraction of the population, treatment discontinuation has been shown to be greater [46]. We can also speculate that in rural areas, where the population density is low, it is easier for the patient to establish with the doctor a more regular and effective relationship with a favourable impact on treatment adherence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One, this phenomenon cannot be due to a reduced accessibility to pharmacies, a factor related to lower adherence to treatment in previous studies [45], because in Italy, pharmacies are more numerous in cities than in the country. Two, economical and social factors (such as the size of the families) are also unlikely to be involved because in Italy, discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment does not appear to be related to patient income and household composition [46]. It is possible, on the contrary, that the greater prevalence of immigrants living in metropolitan areas plays a role because in this fraction of the population, treatment discontinuation has been shown to be greater [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, we have reported recently from the Lombardy database that the chance of starting with a combination of 2 drugs, rather than with monotherapy, is substantially independent by patient income. 28 In summary, our data on real-world drug use offer evidence that antihypertensive therapy with a combination of drugs reduces the risk of CV outcomes with respect to treatment with 1 drug only. They also offer evidence that this is the case when combination treatment is used as first-step therapy compared with patients in whom it is used after initial monotherapy.…”
Section: Corrao Et Al Combination Therapy In Hypertension 569mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, factors, such as ethnicity or socioeconomic status, can be confidently ruled out because the Lombardy population is largely white, and we have previously found that in Lombardy, income and educational differences play no role in the persistence on antihypertensive drug treatment. 33 Furthermore, it is unlikely that the increased risk of HF in patients with low adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment is accounted for a more compromised clinical status because (1) patients prescribed multiple antihypertensive drugs at the start were excluded to minimize participation in the study of individuals with a more severe hypertension and greater cardiovascular risk 14 , (2) data were adjusted for several demographic, therapeutic, and clinical characteristics, (3) although our database did not make BP values available, 32 adjustment included several proxies of the severity of hypertension and the difficulties of achieving therapeutic results, such as the number of antihypertensive drugs, the switching between antihypertensive drug classes, the number of prescribing physicians, and the addition to antihypertensive drug treatment of nonhypertensive cardiovascular agents, 34 and (4) patients with a more severe hypertension and a higher cardiovascular risk are known to have a better rather than a worse adherence to drug treatment. 35 Of course, this does not entirely eliminate the problem of confounding, one aspect of which is that because adherence may be a surrogate for overall health-seeking behavior, patients more adherent to antihypertensive drugs might also have more regularly followed healthy lifestyle advices, more effectively treated other cardiovascular risk factors, or dealt with HF more frequently as out-rather than in-hospital.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%