2012
DOI: 10.1163/016942411x575933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Self-cleaning Surfaces Repel Ice?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, wetting characteristics is studied to better evaluate the icing properties of a surface. Several studies suggest that superhydrophobic surfaces can exhibit icephobic behavior [2,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. While hydrophobic coatings are shown to be able to reduce the ice adhesion strength to some extent, it has been unclear how this reduction correlates with various measurements of a superhydrophobic surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, wetting characteristics is studied to better evaluate the icing properties of a surface. Several studies suggest that superhydrophobic surfaces can exhibit icephobic behavior [2,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. While hydrophobic coatings are shown to be able to reduce the ice adhesion strength to some extent, it has been unclear how this reduction correlates with various measurements of a superhydrophobic surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 To overcome these problems, topographical surface treatment techniques have been developed, resulting in surfaces which passively delay icing and/or reduce ice adhesion strength without external power input. We recently discussed various definitions employed for icephobicity such as the ability of a surface to repel incoming low-temperature water droplets, [11][12][13][14][15][16] delay ice nucleation time, 13,17,18 and lower ice adhesion strength to surfaces 13,[19][20][21][22] in an extensive review article. 23 Over the last two decades, there has been significant progress in research and development of surfaces that are icephobic (to varying extents) according to these definitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superhydrophobic (SH) coatings based on sol–gel technology have been the subject of applied and fundamental studies [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ], exhibiting a water contact angle (WCA) above 150° and a water sliding angle (WSA) lower than 5° [ 2 , 5 ]. Superhydrophobicity, as observed in nature, is characterized by a hierarchical morphology [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ] comprising macro hills or pillars covered with nanometric roughness, the nature of which are three-dimensional epicuticular waxes [ 8 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 ] composed of long chains hydrophobic hydrocarbons. The need for roughness has been stipulated by Cassie and Baxter [ 2 , 7 , 16 , 17 ], supported by the fact that the WCA of the lowest surface energy of a smooth surface is 120° [ 13 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%