2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2006.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do reward programs build loyalty for services?The moderating effect of satisfaction on type and timing of rewards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
167
1
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
167
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The only difference from the bank scenario is in how the cash is awarded in that the supermarket deposits the amount to membership cards in the form of "points." Cashback was chosen because it represents immediate rewards (e.g., discounts or price cuts offered to customers at the point of sale), which have been proven to be more effective than delayed rewards (e.g., vouchers or coupons redeemable at a later date from the point of sale) [25].…”
Section: Scenario Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only difference from the bank scenario is in how the cash is awarded in that the supermarket deposits the amount to membership cards in the form of "points." Cashback was chosen because it represents immediate rewards (e.g., discounts or price cuts offered to customers at the point of sale), which have been proven to be more effective than delayed rewards (e.g., vouchers or coupons redeemable at a later date from the point of sale) [25].…”
Section: Scenario Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the limitations of the questionnaire length, we elected instead to control for general privacy concerns, as previously proposed by Lwin et al [27]. Intentions to protect, fabricate, or withhold were measured by the items adapted from Lwin et al Loyalty was conceptualized as a second order of repeat intention and WOM as suggested by Keh and Lee [25]. The wording of each item was adapted to the context of QR code mobile promotion.…”
Section: Dependent Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors are identified; use of multiple channels [31], high brand association accessibility [25], reduction in time for reward in delayed reward program [5,11], reward types like hard or soft [2,8,11], promotional inducement [18], gathering more customer information [29,32], enhancement of service experience [11] and first mover advantage [33].…”
Section: Success Factors Of Single Operator Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…고객보상프로그램에 대한 대부분의 선행연구들은 항 공사, 호텔, 은행, 레스토랑, 이동전화서비스 등과 같은 서비스 관련 업종으로 제한되어있었으나 (Keh & Lee, 2006;Lee & Kim, 2005;Yi & Jeon, 2003), 최근 그 중 요성이 패션과 같은 구체적 제품과 관련된 분야 및 다 양한 유통업태로까지 확대되어 가고 있다. 소매업태별 고객의 특성에 맞게 고객보상프로그램을 운영하여 고 객과의 관계를 강화해야함을 강조하고 있으나 (Gable et al, 2008), 유통업태별 고객보상프로그램에 대한 효과 를 분석한 연구가 매우 부족하며, 특히 멀티채널의 고객 보상프로그램의 효과에 대한 연구는 전무하므로, 본 연 구는 온-오프라인 채널(온라인 종합몰과 백화점)이 제공 하는 고객보상프로그램의 효과에 관하여 연구하고자 한 다.…”
unclassified
“…본 연구에서는 고객보상프로그램 유형별 효과를 분석 하기 위해 보상채널과 보상시점의 측면에서 살펴보고자 한다. 보상유형에 대한 선행연구들에 의하면, 일반적으 로 가격프로모션과 같이 서비스의 효용과 직접적 관련 이 있는 직접적 보상이 경품, 사은품 등과 같이 제품이 나 서비스 효용에 직접적 연관이 없는 간접적 보상보다 는 효과적인 고객보상프로그램이라고 하였다 (Chung & Kim, 2003;Keh & Lee, 2006). 그러나 그 효과는 업태와 보상시점에 따라 상이한 결과를 도출해냈다 (Ju & Yoo, 2009;Lee & Kim, 2005).…”
unclassified