2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3449379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Rent Increases Reduce the Housing Supply Under Rent Control? Evidence from Evictions in San Francisco

Abstract: Rent control balances strong tenant protections with supply-side incentives for landlords. However, cities with rent control are also some of the United States' most unaffordable, prompting questions about how well these incentives are working. I examine how controlled landlords change their housing supply in response to price increases using a well-identified hyperlocal demand shock: the privately operated commuter shuttle systems in San Francisco. Controlled landlords increased market withdrawal filings and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In paragraphs six to eight and in the first sentence of paragraph nine, we explain the negative effects of rent controls as shown by the scientific evidence (third element). In our case, we explain the negative, unintended consequences of rent controlswaiting lists, black market, poor maintenance, supply reduction-as shown in many empirical studies (Malpezzi, 1998;Sims, 2007;Mora-Sanguinetti, 2011;Andersson and Söderberg, 2012;Kattenberg and Hassink, 2017;Asquith, 2019;Diamond et al, 2019a,b;Kholodilin and Kohl, 2020;Hahn et al, 2021). Regarding the fourth refutational element (connecting with person's values), we (i) refer to the participant's potential fairness concern (see the first three sentences in paragraph four and the last sentence in paragraph nine), (ii) give the example of Stockholm in Sweden, a society with strong fairness concerns, and (iii) cite the study of Swedish researchers Andersson and Söderberg (2012) about the negative effects of rent control there.…”
Section: Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In paragraphs six to eight and in the first sentence of paragraph nine, we explain the negative effects of rent controls as shown by the scientific evidence (third element). In our case, we explain the negative, unintended consequences of rent controlswaiting lists, black market, poor maintenance, supply reduction-as shown in many empirical studies (Malpezzi, 1998;Sims, 2007;Mora-Sanguinetti, 2011;Andersson and Söderberg, 2012;Kattenberg and Hassink, 2017;Asquith, 2019;Diamond et al, 2019a,b;Kholodilin and Kohl, 2020;Hahn et al, 2021). Regarding the fourth refutational element (connecting with person's values), we (i) refer to the participant's potential fairness concern (see the first three sentences in paragraph four and the last sentence in paragraph nine), (ii) give the example of Stockholm in Sweden, a society with strong fairness concerns, and (iii) cite the study of Swedish researchers Andersson and Söderberg (2012) about the negative effects of rent control there.…”
Section: Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This high consensus stems from the abundant empirical evidence on this subject (see, for instance, Diamond et al (2019a) and Kholodilin and Kohl (2020)). Although rent control may have positive effects for a subset of tenants because their rents will be low, or grow less, relative to market rents (Sims, 2007), both total quantity of rental housing available and quality of controlled housing falls (Sims, 2007;Mora-Sanguinetti, 2011;Asquith, 2019;Diamond et al, 2019a; Hahn 1 For instance, in the UK the support for rent controls reached 71% in a poll conducted in December 2019 by Ipsos MORI, with only 9% of people opposing them. This is the most supported policy among other housing policies indicated in the same survey.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%