Do recognition-free recall discrepancies detect retrieval deficits in closed-head injury? demonstrating the inaccuracies of a reviewer's critique

Cicchetti, Domenic V.

doi:10.1080/01688639708403844

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

A Brief Review Of the Problem2

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1997

1998

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite2

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In an earlier publication of JCEN (Cicchetti, 1997), I commented extensively on Veiel's (1997) critique of the Wilde, Boake, and Sherer article that was published in this journal, in 1995.…”

Section: A Brief Review Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 95%

Role of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST) in the Design of Neuropsychologic Research

Cicchetti¹

1998

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: A Brief Review Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 95%

Role of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST) in the Design of Neuropsychologic Research

Cicchetti¹

1998

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The impetus for this article derives from an earlier critical commentary (Cicchetti, 1997a) in which the question of whether there is indeed a meaningful relationship between good science and good peer reviewing arose. Because of its broader relevance for neuropsychology and scientific research more generally, it becomes the major focus for this report.…”

Section: A Brief Review Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%