Do Quantitative Changes in Pain Intensity Correlate with Pain Relief and Satisfaction?

Abstract

Abstract. Objective: To correlate measured pain intensity (PI) changes with pain relief and satisfaction with pain management. Methods: A prospective single-group repeated-measures design study. A heterogeneous group of patients were asked to record their levels of PI at initial presentation and at ED release using a numerical descriptor scale (NDS) and a visual analog scale (VAS). At release, a 5-point pain relief scale and a pain management satisfaction survey were also completed. Results: A convenience sample of 81 patients were enrolled over the study period. The average reduction in PI for all patients was 33%. A 5%, 30%, and 57% reduction in PI correlated with "no," "somdpartial," and "significantlcomplete" relief, respectively ( p c 0.001). However, when patients were divided into 2 groups based on their initial PI scores, patients with moderatdsevere pain (NDS > 5 ) required a reduction of 35% and 84% in PI to achieve "somdpartial" and "significanWcomplete" relief, respectively. Patients in less pain (NDS I 5) needed 25% and 29% reductions in PI for the same categories ( p = 0.8). Patients were generally satisfied with their pain management. There was a positive association between pain relief and satisfaction with pain management. Conclueion: There is a significant association between changes in PI and pain relief. Greater reductions in PI are required for patients presenting with more severe initial pain to achieve relief compared with those who have lesser initial PI. While there is a linear relationship between increasing pain relief and satisfaction, relief of pain appears to only partially contribute to overall satisfaction with pain management.

Better late than never? Impact of local analgesia timing on postoperative pain in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and metaanalysis

“…Using this scale, patients mark the severity of their pain on a 100-mm line, with 0 generally representing no pain and 100 mm representing the worst pain imaginable. Findings also have shown the VAS to be linear, meaning that changes in the VAS represent a relative change in the magnitude of pain sensation [22].…”

No Difference in Early Analgesia Between Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection and Intrathecal Morphine After TKA

“…All patients were analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized. Primary outcome measures included 10-point numerical, or visual analog, pain scores at rest (VAS [29,34,40,44,47,79,81,84]) at 1, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively; VAS pain scores at postoperative days 1 (at the hospital), 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (upon awakening in the morning); and in-hospital narcotic use (converted into morphine equivalents). Pain scores were collected both in and out of the hospital.…”

Survey of pain etiology, management practices and patient satisfaction in two urban emergency departments

“…In that study, pain relief was a significant predictor of patient satisfaction with pain management. 13 Based on these studies as well as our findings, it seems prudent to recommend that pain intensity be assessed routinely both at arrival and at the time of ED discharge, to better monitor this important patient-focused outcome. Given the fact that only half of our patients in pain received any analgesic, and that these were administered 2 hours after ED presentation, it is also important to recommend early administration of analgesics to all patients reporting pain who do not have an analgesic contraindication.…”