1999
DOI: 10.1159/000331084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Qualifiers of ASCUS Distinguish Between Low- and High-Risk Patients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14] Although controversial, the stratification of ASCUS into reactive and dysplastic categories is thought to aid in determining which lesions are most likely to be associated with dysplasia. 13,[15][16][17][18] To the best of our knowledge, there is only one study in the Englishlanguage literature addressing the follow-up of ASCUS diagnosis in adolescents. 19 In that study, the incidence of ASCUS in patients aged 14-18 years was 10.9%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[12][13][14] Although controversial, the stratification of ASCUS into reactive and dysplastic categories is thought to aid in determining which lesions are most likely to be associated with dysplasia. 13,[15][16][17][18] To the best of our knowledge, there is only one study in the Englishlanguage literature addressing the follow-up of ASCUS diagnosis in adolescents. 19 In that study, the incidence of ASCUS in patients aged 14-18 years was 10.9%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, 524 adolescents met the study criteria. The mean age was 15.7 years (range, [13][14][15][16][17]. The results of adolescent Pap smears in comparison to those from adult women are shown in Table I.…”
Section: Simsir Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Since follow-up biopsies would be obtained because of an abnormal cytologic result, the false negative fraction could either not be calculated or would be greatly underestimated. Comparing concurrent cytology and biopsy allows false negatives and false positives to be determined, but it does not estimate the accuracy of a screening procedure since the biopsied population would have been previously screened and would have a high rate of cervical pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, some investigators detected significant lesions even in the ASCUSreactive group. 4,5,11 To resolve this issue to some extent, the 2001 Bethesda System has simplified this diagnostic category by eliminating the ASCUSreactive group and limiting the diagnosis to ASCUS and atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), both requiring follow-up. 12 In our laboratory, the ASCUS rate was 5.9% (720 of 12,071) according to Bethesda 1991.…”
Section: Ascus Is a Term That Was Introduced Into Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Follow-up of these smears has shown varied results, ranging from a very few significant lesions to a very high percentage of high grade lesions. [2][3][4][5] The results of the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS), the largest trial to date, revealed that the majority of ASCUS cases harbor only benign lesions. On analysis of the cases that were colposcoped immediately following the ASCUS diagnosis, it was found that 25.4% had no significant lesion on colposcopic examination, 46.9% had no pathologic findings on biopsy, and 14.5% had low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) lesions that most likely were benign biologically and usually regressed spontaneously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%