2016
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000002737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Prolonged Prophylactic Antibiotics Reduce the Incidence of Surgical-Site Infections in Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction?

Abstract: Prolonged antibiotic use did not have a statistically significant effect on reducing surgical-site infections or implant loss. There was significant heterogeneity between studies, and prolonged antibiotics may have increased the risk of implant loss in the randomized controlled trial. Definitive evidence may only be obtained with data from more prospective randomized controlled trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a recent study concluded that prolonged antibiotics use did not have a statistically significant effect on reducing surgical-site infection or implant loss. 15 More prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether prolonged prophylactic antibiotics are truly beneficial in breast reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent study concluded that prolonged antibiotics use did not have a statistically significant effect on reducing surgical-site infection or implant loss. 15 More prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether prolonged prophylactic antibiotics are truly beneficial in breast reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Pooled analysis from a systematic literature review conducted by Wang et al in 2016 concluded that the risk of surgical site infection in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction was 1.43 times higher in patients receiving less than 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics. 11 Finally, Huang et al also concluded that extended antibiotic prophylaxis greater than 24 hours decreases the risk of SSI but could not make any conclusive statements on a specific optimal time for prophylaxis. 12…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] Then, this conclusion was updated by 2 recent pairwise meta-analyses, which determined that antibiotic prophylaxis was effective by simply comparing experimental and control arms [39,40] and prolonged application seemed to have no clinical benefit based on insufficient high-quality raw data. [41] However, all 4 publications failed to perform a quantitative network estimation, and their classifications of strategies lacked accurateness and meticulousness, which may not reveal the essential roles of different strategies. And these publications basically only payed attention on PRA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%