Do Private Tutoring Expenditures Raise Academic Performance? Evidence from Middle School Students in South Korea

Abstract

To shed light on the effectiveness of educational inputs for student outcomes, this paper examines the effect of private tutoring expenditures on the academic performance of middle school students in South Korea. To address endogeneity, the paper uses instrumental variables, first‐difference, propensity‐score matching and nonparametric bounding methods. We apply these methods to a panel dataset from South Korea, the Korea Education Longitudinal Study. The results show that the true effect of private tutoring remains, at most, modest. Instrumental variables (first‐difference) estimates suggest that a 10‐percent increase in expenditure raises a test score by 0.03 standard deviations or 1.1 percent (0.002 standard deviations or 0.08 percent). Matching estimates imply that the same amount of increase in expenditure leads to a 0.33 to 0.72 percent higher average test score. The tightest bounds of the effect of tutoring reveal that a 10‐percent increase in expenditure improves the test score by a low of 0 to a high of 2.01 percent, while statistical tests fail to rule out zero effects. The modest effects of private tutoring found in the present study are comparable to the effects of public school expenditures on test scores and earnings estimated in previous studies.

The impact of shadow education on student academic achievement: Why the research is inconclusive and what can be done about it

“…Other analysts of KELS include Lee (2013) and Ryu and Kang (2013), who have in parallel used PSM with other methods to estimate the causal effects of dimensions of tutoring on verbal, English and mathematics competencies in , 2006and 2007. Ryu and Kang (2013 reported only overall effects, but Lee reported details on each competency by year.…”

Assessing the instructional quality of private tutoring and its effects on student outcomes: Analyses from the German National Educational Panel Study

“…However, empirical findings on the effectiveness of private tutoring are rather contradictory. Among longitudinal studies that controlled for systematic differences between students with and without tutoring, some found a positive effect on achievement (Berberoğlu & Tansel, ; Ireson & Rushforth, ), but others found minimal effects or none at all (Park, Buchmann, Choi, & Merry, ; Ryu & Kang, ; Smyth, ). Therefore, it is not sufficient to ask whether private tutoring per se is effective in improving students’ achievement.…”

Autonomy, Incentives, and School Performance: Evidence from the 2009 Autonomous Private High School Policy in Korea

“…Table 2 shows that students in autonomous schools tend to spend more on private tutoring than their peers in traditional non-autonomous schools. To the extent that private tutoring may improve the academic achievement of students, as discussed in a number of recent studies (e.g., Kang, 2012;Ryu and Kang, 2013), the estimated autonomous school premium reported in column (4) of Table 3 could be spuriously driven by the differences in private tutoring investment. To check for this possibility, I add the amount of private tutoring expenditures for each subject as an additional control variable in column (5).…”