Abstract:Both the American Cancer Society and National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend annual clinical breast examination (CBE) along with screening mammogram (SM) for patients starting at 40 years of age. However, patients with a palpable breast mass should have a diagnostic mammogram (DM) during workup. Review at our institution demonstrated that 11% of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and self-identified breast mass had SM instead of DM. This led us to question whether primary care physicians (PCP)… Show more
“…In Brazil, strategies for early breast cancer diagnosis must take a three‐pronged approach comprising a population aware of the signs and suspicious symptoms of the disease, health professionals qualified to evaluate even difficult‐to‐detect cancer cases and qualified health services, in order to guarantee integral medical assistance (Brasil, ). It is possible to assess facilitators regarding this process, during gynaecological consultations, as health professionals may promote education and awareness actions directed to interventions, such as clinical breast exams and mammograms (Larson, Cowher, O'Rourke, Patel, & Pratt, ). Because of this, it is supposed that women who frequently attend gynaecological consultations are more likely to detect breast cancer in its early stages (Azenha et al, ; Larson et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to assess facilitators regarding this process, during gynaecological consultations, as health professionals may promote education and awareness actions directed to interventions, such as clinical breast exams and mammograms (Larson, Cowher, O'Rourke, Patel, & Pratt, 2016). Because of this, it is supposed that women who frequently attend gynaecological consultations are more likely to detect breast cancer in its early stages (Azenha et al, 2011;Larson et al, 2016). American researchers TA B L E 3 Factors to the delay in symptomatic presentation on women's perception (data from 182 women who thought that there was a delay) concluded that women who do not frequently use health services and seek out less preventive attention are more prone to delays in presentation (Rauscher et al, 2010).…”
Section: The Observed Time Interval Was Shorter In Countries Such Asmentioning
The aim of this study was to evaluate delays in the presentation of symptomatic breast cancer in women (time interval between the perception of their first sign or symptom until the first medical appointment) and its risk factors. A cohort study composed of patients with breast cancer (symptomatic) admitted to an oncological centre in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil was performed. The patients were interviewed during their first hospital visit. To assess time interval as a continuous variable, the median and interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated. The outcome comprised delay in breast cancer presentation when time from the first sign or symptom perception to the first medical appointment was ≥90 days. A descriptive analysis was performed. The association between independent variables (epidemiological, social and demographic data, related to individual healthcare, clinical and current disease) and the outcome (delay in symptomatic presentation) was assessed by a univariate analysis applying odds ratios (OR). Associations with p < .20 in the univariate analysis were included in the multiple logistic regression model. Variables with a p < .05 were retained in the final model. A total of 388 women were included. The median time was of 41 days (interquartile range — IQR: 13.2–130.0); 34.3% delayed presentation at ≥ 90 days. After adjustment, the variables associated with a delay in presentation were frequency of gynaecological examination of over than 1 year (OR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.67–4.05), no family history of breast cancer (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.15–3.35), and income lower than the minimum wage (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.03–2.55). A higher score in tangible support (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96–0.99) was associated with a lesser chance of delay in presentation. Thus, delay in presentation was associated with social barriers, access to health service, health information and individual factors.
“…In Brazil, strategies for early breast cancer diagnosis must take a three‐pronged approach comprising a population aware of the signs and suspicious symptoms of the disease, health professionals qualified to evaluate even difficult‐to‐detect cancer cases and qualified health services, in order to guarantee integral medical assistance (Brasil, ). It is possible to assess facilitators regarding this process, during gynaecological consultations, as health professionals may promote education and awareness actions directed to interventions, such as clinical breast exams and mammograms (Larson, Cowher, O'Rourke, Patel, & Pratt, ). Because of this, it is supposed that women who frequently attend gynaecological consultations are more likely to detect breast cancer in its early stages (Azenha et al, ; Larson et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to assess facilitators regarding this process, during gynaecological consultations, as health professionals may promote education and awareness actions directed to interventions, such as clinical breast exams and mammograms (Larson, Cowher, O'Rourke, Patel, & Pratt, 2016). Because of this, it is supposed that women who frequently attend gynaecological consultations are more likely to detect breast cancer in its early stages (Azenha et al, 2011;Larson et al, 2016). American researchers TA B L E 3 Factors to the delay in symptomatic presentation on women's perception (data from 182 women who thought that there was a delay) concluded that women who do not frequently use health services and seek out less preventive attention are more prone to delays in presentation (Rauscher et al, 2010).…”
Section: The Observed Time Interval Was Shorter In Countries Such Asmentioning
The aim of this study was to evaluate delays in the presentation of symptomatic breast cancer in women (time interval between the perception of their first sign or symptom until the first medical appointment) and its risk factors. A cohort study composed of patients with breast cancer (symptomatic) admitted to an oncological centre in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil was performed. The patients were interviewed during their first hospital visit. To assess time interval as a continuous variable, the median and interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated. The outcome comprised delay in breast cancer presentation when time from the first sign or symptom perception to the first medical appointment was ≥90 days. A descriptive analysis was performed. The association between independent variables (epidemiological, social and demographic data, related to individual healthcare, clinical and current disease) and the outcome (delay in symptomatic presentation) was assessed by a univariate analysis applying odds ratios (OR). Associations with p < .20 in the univariate analysis were included in the multiple logistic regression model. Variables with a p < .05 were retained in the final model. A total of 388 women were included. The median time was of 41 days (interquartile range — IQR: 13.2–130.0); 34.3% delayed presentation at ≥ 90 days. After adjustment, the variables associated with a delay in presentation were frequency of gynaecological examination of over than 1 year (OR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.67–4.05), no family history of breast cancer (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.15–3.35), and income lower than the minimum wage (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.03–2.55). A higher score in tangible support (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96–0.99) was associated with a lesser chance of delay in presentation. Thus, delay in presentation was associated with social barriers, access to health service, health information and individual factors.
“…8,36 This suggested that our sample was not following older screening recommendations across cancer sites/breast cancer screening behaviors but receiving clinical breast exams and possibly mammography referrals during annual visits with their primary care providers. 47,48 However, it is not clear whether Black women are receiving guidance that reflects pre-USPSTF recommendations or no screening recommendation at all during these encounters. Research has documented that providers are less likely to recommend mammography screening to Black women compared to their White patients.…”
Background-Updated United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and American Cancer Society mammography screening recommendations push for increased age of initiation and lengthened breast cancer screening intervals. These changes have implications for the reduction of breast cancer mortality in Black women. The purpose of this study was to examine breast cancer screening behavior in a cohort of Southern Black women after the release of the 2009 USPSTF recommendations.
“…One of the most effective measures to reduce breast cancer mortality is early detection (Amasha 2013;Larson et al 2016;O'Mahony et al 2017;Somayyeh and Aydogdu 2019). Breast cancer research, early detection and treatment have increased the survival rate of cancer patients, but not the incidence of breast cancer.…”
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed tumor in women in the world. Early detection and treatment of breast cancer has an impact on life expectancy, reduced mortality and improved quality of life. The reduction in mortality depends largely on interventions. The objective of this study was to describe the reasons for not participating in breast cancer screening, ways to obtain information and measures to improve participation in screening. The survey was conducted among 1200 women aged 50-69 in Estonia. Statistical data analysis was performed with SPSS 26.0, using descriptive statistics. For comparison of the results with background data, the Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-square test were used. The main reason for not participating in breast cancer screening was the absence of symptoms. Information on breast cancer and breast cancer screening is mostly obtained from friends and acquaintances, and the least from the mobile application on breast cancer screening. The most desirable sources of information about breast cancer are information leaflets and the family doctor, and the internet is the least searched for information. Convenient access to a mammography examination and the family doctor's initiative provide support, while the information in women's magazines and social media has low importance for participation. The information channels used were related to age, native language and level of education. Place of residence did not affect access to information. The results show that women seek information primarily from friends and acquaintances, although they are also open to seek information from leaflets or the family doctor, indicating the need for more emphasis on those sources. Different sociodemographic variables should be considered in related communication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.