2011
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-66432011000200007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do pollinators respond in a dose-dependent manner to flower herbivory?: An experimental assessment in Loasa tricolor (Loasaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, partial or total petal removal in Loasa tricolor (Loasaceae) had contrasting effects on pollination rates, indicating a dose‐dependent response of pollinators to flower herbivory (Cares‐Suárez et al . ). These results differ from those obtained by Cuartas‐Domínguez & Medel (), who reported that phenotypic modification of the lateral sepals and the labellar lobe of Chloraea bletioides (Orchidaceae) had no effect on male and female fitness functions.…”
Section: A Review Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, partial or total petal removal in Loasa tricolor (Loasaceae) had contrasting effects on pollination rates, indicating a dose‐dependent response of pollinators to flower herbivory (Cares‐Suárez et al . ). These results differ from those obtained by Cuartas‐Domínguez & Medel (), who reported that phenotypic modification of the lateral sepals and the labellar lobe of Chloraea bletioides (Orchidaceae) had no effect on male and female fitness functions.…”
Section: A Review Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Cares‐Suárez et al . ) herbivory with another variable related to the pollination process. Explicit tests searching for statistically significant interaction terms and indirect effects in factorial experimental designs were restricted to two studies, which provided mixed results.…”
Section: A Review Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Florivory often reduces flower size ( Strauss and Whittall 2006 ) and nectar production ( Krupnick et al 1999 ; Strauss and Whittall 2006 ), both of which may reduce pollinator visitation as many pollinators tend to prefer larger flowers and greater nectar production ( Bell 1985 ; Galen 1989 ; Kudoh and Whigham 1998 ; Krupnick et al 1999 ; Arista and Ortiz 2007 ; Shumitt 2014 ). An increasing number of studies suggest that floral damage can indeed decrease pollinator visitation ( Karban and Strauss 1993 ; Pohl et al 2006 ; Ashman and Penet 2007 ; Penet et al 2009 ; Cardel and Koptur 2010 ; Sõber et al 2010 ; Cares-Suárez et al 2011 ), potentially resulting in reduced pollination and plant fitness ( Krupnick and Weis 1999 ; Mothershead and Marquis 2000 ; Leavitt and Robertson 2006 ; McCall and Irwin 2006 ; Strauss and Whittall 2006 ; Sánchez-Lafuente 2007 ; Carezza et al 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recruitment of those plants depending on pollination vectors (usually autoincompatible plants) is expected to diminish because of the herbivory, both directly (tissue damage) and indirectly due to the reduction of the pollinator visit rates [69,70,76], modifying plant fitness in many possible ways [77]. Moreover, the damage of certain key flower structure (e.g., nectar guides) could enhance this situation [78], especially if the flower damage goes beyond a damage threshold that makes the pollinators reluctant to visit the flowers [79].…”
Section: Complex Relationships: a Multi-interaction Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%