2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do plants have a segregated germline?

Abstract: For the last 100 years, it has been uncontroversial to state that the plant germline is set aside late in development, but there is surprisingly little evidence to support this view. In contrast, much evolutionary theory and several recent empirical studies seem to suggest the opposite—that the germlines of some and perhaps most plants may be set aside early in development. But is this really the case? How much does it matter? How can we reconcile the new evidence with existing knowledge of plant development? … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
81
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA methylation in plants is a relatively stable and transgenerationally heritable epigenetic mark, yet it also is known to be dynamic in its genomic distribution, undergoing spontaneous epimutations and being subject to intrinsic and extrinsic perturbations (Zhang et al ., ; Schmitz et al ., ; Kawakatsu et al ., ; Niederhuth et al ., ; Quadrana & Colot, ; Takuno et al ., ). Because plants do not set aside an early, clearly defined germline (Grossniklaus, ; but see Lanfear, ), somatically acquired DNA methylation modifications can be transgenerationally inherited, potentially contributing to adaptation and evolution. Among the intrinsic causative factors that may drive the evolution of DNA methylation, interspecific hybridization and WGD are perhaps the most pervasive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA methylation in plants is a relatively stable and transgenerationally heritable epigenetic mark, yet it also is known to be dynamic in its genomic distribution, undergoing spontaneous epimutations and being subject to intrinsic and extrinsic perturbations (Zhang et al ., ; Schmitz et al ., ; Kawakatsu et al ., ; Niederhuth et al ., ; Quadrana & Colot, ; Takuno et al ., ). Because plants do not set aside an early, clearly defined germline (Grossniklaus, ; but see Lanfear, ), somatically acquired DNA methylation modifications can be transgenerationally inherited, potentially contributing to adaptation and evolution. Among the intrinsic causative factors that may drive the evolution of DNA methylation, interspecific hybridization and WGD are perhaps the most pervasive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With some additional assumptions it is also possible to estimate the mutation rate per generation, and to compare this to estimates from other plants. The average height of an adult E. melliodora individual is between 15 m and 30 m 24 , so if we assume that all somatic mutations are potentially heritable (about which there is limited evidence 1 and ongoing discussion 25 ) we can estimate that the per-generation mutation rate is between 4.13×10 −8 and 8.25×10 −8 mutations per base per generation. For comparison the roughly 20 cm tall Arabidopsis thaliana has a per-generation mutation rate of 7.1×10 −9 mutations per base 26 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proliferation throughout the population could then occur as other polymorphisms, probably predominately through stochastic demographic forces but possibly also through natural selection (Shedge et al 2010). Several aspects of this process are unknown, including how mitogenomes are replicated (Gualberto & Newton 2017), the timing of germline segregation (Lanfear 2018), and when, where, and under what circumstances AGCs arise. For these reasons, the relationship between recombination within individuals summarized in Table 4 and re-arrangement rates among species is unclear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%