2013
DOI: 10.1186/1472-684x-12-39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do pilocarpine drops help dry mouth in palliative care patients: a protocol for an aggregated series of n-of-1 trials

Abstract: BackgroundIt is estimated that 39,000 Australians die from malignant disease yearly. Of these, 60% to 88% of advanced cancer patients suffer xerostomia, the subjective feeling of mouth dryness. Xerostomia has significant physical, social and psychological consequences which compromise function and quality of life. Pilocarpine is one treatment for xerostomia. Most studies have shown some variation in individual response to pilocarpine, in terms of dose used, and timing and extent of response.We will determine a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…“To describe participants’ overall response, three types of Bayesian results will be presented: (i) the mean of the posterior distribution of the mean difference between placebo and stimulant scores, which gives the best estimate of the overall effect size difference between treatments; (ii) the associated 95% credible region, which give intervals of uncertainty (in this case the 2.5 and 97.5 percentile) of the posterior distributions used in (i); and (iii) the posterior probability of the mean difference that stimulant scores were better than placebo scores, which describes the likelihood that the patients will favour the active treatment in future cycles 34 . A patient will be defined to be a ‘responder’ when these estimated values exceed predefined threshold values 34 .”33…”
Section: Section 3c: Methods—data Collection Management and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…“To describe participants’ overall response, three types of Bayesian results will be presented: (i) the mean of the posterior distribution of the mean difference between placebo and stimulant scores, which gives the best estimate of the overall effect size difference between treatments; (ii) the associated 95% credible region, which give intervals of uncertainty (in this case the 2.5 and 97.5 percentile) of the posterior distributions used in (i); and (iii) the posterior probability of the mean difference that stimulant scores were better than placebo scores, which describes the likelihood that the patients will favour the active treatment in future cycles 34 . A patient will be defined to be a ‘responder’ when these estimated values exceed predefined threshold values 34 .”33…”
Section: Section 3c: Methods—data Collection Management and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“For each cycle, data from day 1 will be discarded to allow for a wash-out period, and data from days 2 and 3 will be analysed.”33…”
Section: Section 3c: Methods—data Collection Management and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10 ] Similarly, for pilocarpine, the side effect rate is high (usually the result of generalized parasympathomimetic stimulation), and side effects tend to be the main reason for withdrawal. [ 11 12 ] These side effects include sweating, wheezing, abdominal cramps, lacrimation, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness, headache, palpitations, asthenia, chills, increased urinary frequency, and rhinitis. These can lead not only to patients’ poor adherence to the pharmacological treatment but also to RAIT.…”
Section: Pharmacological Interventions For Managing Radioactive Iodinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small number of trials have been conducted to investigate the effect of pilocarpine in the alleviation of xerostomia using formulations aimed at mucosal absorption in the mouth rather than systemic absorption from the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The formulations of pilocarpine were pastilles, lozenges, buccal inserts, mouthwashes and eye drops to be taken by mouth (Bernardi et al, 2002;Gibson et al, 2007;Hamlar et al, 1996;Kim et al, 2014;Nikles, Mitchell et al, 2013;Rupel et al, 2014;Tanigawa et al, 2015;Taweechaisupapong et al, 2006).…”
Section: Research Plan 181 Research Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tablets and capsules designed to be swallowed whole were excluded in order to focus on products that could deliver pilocarpine buccally. Pilocarpine has been previously formulated in the form of a buccal insert (Gibson et al, 2007), mouthwashes (Kim et al, 2014;Tanigawa et al, 2015), eye drops administered orally (Nikles et al, 2013), pastilles (Hamlar et al, 1996), lozenges (Taweechaisupapong et al, 2006) and chewing gum (Singh & Singh, 2003). The buccal inserts are not suitable for extemporaneous compounding in community compounding pharmacies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%