2005
DOI: 10.1159/000086047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Patients with Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Ventricular Arrhythmias Have a Normal Right Ventricular Wall Motion?

Abstract: Background/Aim: Patients with ventricular ectopy from the right ventricular (RV) outflow tract (RVOT) are often referred for RV angiography to exclude disorders such as arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D). This is usually based on a qualitative assessment of the wall motion. We present a method to quantify the wall motion and to apply this method to compare patients with RVOT ectopy to normal subjects. Methods: RV angiograms were analyzed from 19 normal subjects and 11 subjects with RVOT ventri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There also have been recent developments to quantitate the extent of right ventricular wall motion abnormalities by angiography using computer based analysis as well as to determine right ventricular volumes51,52 In addition, there is commercial software available to determine RV volumes and ejection fraction 53. The right ventricular angiogram obtained in multiple views is considered to be a reliable imaging test to assess wall motion abnormalities but requires considerable experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There also have been recent developments to quantitate the extent of right ventricular wall motion abnormalities by angiography using computer based analysis as well as to determine right ventricular volumes51,52 In addition, there is commercial software available to determine RV volumes and ejection fraction 53. The right ventricular angiogram obtained in multiple views is considered to be a reliable imaging test to assess wall motion abnormalities but requires considerable experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is problematic to detect by current imaging techniques segmental ventricular lesions localized to the RVOT and RV anterior free wall (22,23). A recent angiographic study of computer-based quantitative segmental contraction analysis of the RV free wall demonstrated that wall motion is nonuniform in different RV regions: tricuspid valve zones show the greatest movement during contraction, whereas anterior and infundibular regions the least movement (24). In the present study, we demonstrated that EVM, by assessing the electrical rather than the mechanical effects of loss of RV myocardium, obviated limitations in RVOT wall motion analysis and increased the sensitivity for detecting otherwise concealed ARVC/D myocardial substrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant inter-observer variation in initial qualitative assessment was observed in our study, so where possible quantitative assessments should be used: measurement of indexed RV volumes is essential in our view. New software developments may improve assessment of regional wall motion abnormalities [9,18]. Simple dimension measurements may be helpful, as in our study, and the findings in our study may add to formulation of a reference range when similar techniques and views are used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%