Do Pasture-Scale Nutritional Patterns Affect Cattle Distribution on Rangelands?

Abstract

Heterogeneous distribution of ungulates about the landscape can be a particularly vexing problem for resource managers. Although livestock preferences for leaves over stems among plants and patches of herbage are well documented, effects of senescent forage (herbage supporting both green and cured materials) on cattle distribution and nutrition at pasture scales have not been investigated. Our primary objective was to determine the proportions of time cattle spent foraging within senescent and conditioned sectors (areas supporting only current season's herbage) of pastures. Other endeavors included the following: comparing velocities of foraging cattle in conditioned and senescent sectors, determining diet quality of cattle confined to conditioned and senescent treatments, and quantifying levels of forage utilization by cattle in conditioned and senescent treatments. Global positioning system collars were used to track cattle movement and activity in treated crested wheatgrass (Agropyron desertorum [Fisher ex Link] Schultes) pastures. Over a 7-day trial, cattle were found in senescent and conditioned areas 41% and 59% of the time, respectively. When cattle were grazing, 32% of observations were in senescent sectors and 68% were in conditioned areas. With a decline in standing crop in the conditioned treatment, cattle switched to senescent herbage (73% of observations) on day 7. Standing crop was reduced by 13% to 40% in conditioned sectors and increased by 10% in senescent areas. Despite disparities in the crude protein of standing crops in senescent ( x ¼ 6.5%) and conditioned ( x ¼ 11.3%) treatments, cattle confined to treatment harvested diets of similar quality ( x ¼ 13.6% CP) at turn-out. Cattle walked farther when making transitions between treatments, and walked farther each day as the trial progressed. A preference of foraging cattle for portions of pastures grazed (conditioned areas) during the previous growing season suggests that utilization patterns established by livestock are self-sustaining. ResumenLa distribució n heterogénea de los ungulados con respecto al paisaje puede ser un problema particularmente irritante para los manejadores de recursos. Mientras que las preferencias del ganado por las hojas sobre los tallos, entre plantas y parches de vegetació n está n bien documentados, los efectos del forraje senescente (forraje sosteniendo tanto forraje verde como seco) sobre la distribució n y nutrició n del ganado a nivel de potrero no han sido investigados. Nuestro principal objetivo fue determinar las proporciones de tiempo que el ganado pasa pastando dentro de sectores senescentes y condicionados (á reas que sostienen solo el forraje de la estació n en curso) de los potreros. Otras actividades incluidas fueron: comparar las velocidades de pasteo del ganado en los sectores senescentes y condicionados; determinar de la calidad de la dieta del ganado confinado a tratamientos senescente y condicionado y cuantificar los niveles de utilizació n por el ganado en los tratamientos senescente y c...

Effect of herbage mass on the selection and use by cattle of fine‐scale locations in a progressively grazed tropical grass pasture

“…2000; Bergman et al . 2001; Ganskopp and Bohnert 2006; Hirata et al . 2006) or at a feeding station scale in well‐controlled experimental environments (Laca et al .…”

“…1995; Wilmshurst et al . 1995; Ganskopp and Bohnert 2006) or investigated choice of fine‐scale locations in well‐controlled experimental environments (i.e. simplified reality) where animals were offered an artificially created vegetation mosaic with a high degree of contrast (e.g.…”

Foraging behavior of heritage versus recently introduced herbivores on desert landscapes of the American Southwest

“…The subset of consecutive animal locations that were between .5 and ,100 m were assumed to include foraging and short distance walking activities. Within this subset of locations, we assigned an animal position to foraging when the left/right motion sensor counts exceeded the 55th percentile based on previous studies (Ganskopp and Bohnert 2006). A 55th percentile was determined for each individual animal and season using all recorded motion sensor data.…”

Monitoring lidia cattle with GPS-GPRS technology; a study on grazing behaviour and spatial distribution

“…Esta frecuencia se decidió teniendo en cuenta las metodologías utilizadas en los trabajos publicados. [40][41][42] La distancia recorrida, por sí sola, no es un buen indicador de la actividad animal, pero se puede obtener información precisa sobre el pastoreo, los desplazamientos y el descanso del ganado con los datos proporcionados por los dispositivos GPS. 35 La distancia recorrida debe ser próxima a cero para un animal que está descansando, y alta para un animal que cambia de ubicación.…”