Do papers (really) match journals’ “aims and scope”? A computational assessment of innovation studies

Building multiscalar sustainable ocean governance: How do global perspectives interact with the Portuguese national approach?

“…We analyzed UN SDG reports from 2016 to 2020 and the Portuguese government's official programs and national ocean strategies from 2005 to 2022. To evaluate the alignment between the two sets of documents and assess whether the Portuguese government incorporated the principles of complementarity in its ocean public policies, we employed content analysis and discourse analysis as proven methodologies in various fields [ [67] , [68] , [69] ]. We aimed to identify and compare trends in the texts related to ocean governance.…”

The IPR of the beholder: The Economics and Strategy knowledge based on IPR, patents and trademarks

“…In mapping and measuring scholarly contributions from Economics and Strategy to the wider policy and management contexts where IPR knowledge is actually deployed, this paper seeks to provide evidence that could be instrumental for current and future users. If the literature on intangible assets like patents and trademarks reflects activities and breakthroughs about IPRs, an informed analysis of bibliometric indicators can shed some light on how this matter may impact on the "real" world (see Caraça et al, 2009;Cunha et al, 2010;Santos & Mendonça, 2022a) . The publications can point to the rise in importance of given issues, the institutions originating it, the content dynamics of the topics pursued over time, etc.…”

“…The publications can point to the rise in importance of given issues, the institutions originating it, the content dynamics of the topics pursued over time, etc. (see also Costa & Pestana, 2020;Santos & Mendonça, 2022a, 2022b.…”