2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41432-021-0194-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do panoramic radiographs offer improved diagnostic accuracy over clinical examination and other radiographic techniques in children?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 9 ] For example, it has been reported that clinicians’ diagnostic accuracy when using panoramic radiography for detecting condylar fractures is about 70%. [ 10 ] In spite of these problems, only a limited number of studies have used AI algorithms to detect maxillofacial traumas. [ 11 12 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 9 ] For example, it has been reported that clinicians’ diagnostic accuracy when using panoramic radiography for detecting condylar fractures is about 70%. [ 10 ] In spite of these problems, only a limited number of studies have used AI algorithms to detect maxillofacial traumas. [ 11 12 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 They are considered the standard of care in assessing caries with the greatest accuracy and so should be utilised as such. 1,2,6,7,8 However, they can increase gag reflex, presenting further challenges in uncooperative paediatric patients, leading to improper positioning or re-takes causing re-exposure. 4,8,9 EBWs and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) have been found to be comparable to intra-oral bitewings for assessing proximal caries 4,10 and reduce risks in terms of gaging and also aerosol production during COVID-19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%