2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06505-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do palliative embolization in unresectable, unsalvageable recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer patients help?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, palliative embolization was effective with a bleed-free interval from several weeks to 21 months. This report also mentions that several patients initiated palliative chemotherapy following successful embolization, but no other details were given [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, palliative embolization was effective with a bleed-free interval from several weeks to 21 months. This report also mentions that several patients initiated palliative chemotherapy following successful embolization, but no other details were given [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a retrospective review, Shetty et al show that intra-arterial salvage embolization in patients with unresectable tumors is safe and provides adequate control of bleeding with only 3/26 (11.5%) having recurrent bleeding post-procedure. 6 Others have demonstrated the use of endovascular embolization in palliative patients with high success rates and the ability of patients to remain home with loved ones prior to this death. 7 More recently, tumor chemoembolization has grown in popularity with advances in intra-arterial catheters for superselective delivery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%