Do open youth unemployment and youth programs leave the same mental health scars? - Evidence from a Swedish 27-year cohort study

Abstract

BackgroundRecent findings suggest that the mental health costs of unemployment are related to both short- and long-term mental health scars. The main policy tools for dealing with young people at risk of labor market exclusion are Active Labor Market Policy programs for youths (youth programs). There has been little research on the potential effects of participation in youth programs on mental health and even less on whether participation in such programs alleviates the long-term mental health scarring caused by unemployment. This study compares exposure to open youth unemployment and exposure to youth program participation between ages 18 and 21 in relation to adult internalized mental health immediately after the end of the exposure period at age 21 and two decades later at age 43.MethodsThe study uses a five wave Swedish 27-year prospective cohort study consisting of all graduates from compulsory school in an industrial town in Sweden initiated in 1981. Of the original 1083 participants 94.3 % of those alive were still participating at the 27-year follow up. Exposure to open unemployment and youth programs were measured between ages 18–21. Mental health, indicated through an ordinal level three item composite index of internalized mental health symptoms (IMHS), was measured pre-exposure at age 16 and post exposure at ages 21 and 42.Ordinal regressions of internalized mental health at ages 21 and 43 were performed using the Polytomous Universal Model (PLUM). Models were controlled for pre-exposure internalized mental health as well as other available confounders.ResultsResults show strong and significant relationships between exposure to open youth unemployment and IMHS at age 21 (OR = 2.48, CI = 1.57–3.60) as well as at age 43 (OR = 1.71, CI = 1.20–2.43). No such significant relationship is observed for exposure to youth programs at age 21 (OR = 0.95, CI = 0.72–1.26) or at age 43 (OR = 1.23, CI = 0.93–1.63).ConclusionsA considered and consistent active labor market policy directed at youths could potentially reduce the short- and long-term mental health costs of youth unemployment.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2496-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Unemployment among young people and mental health: A systematic review

“…Three studies showed significant effects when controlling for confounders including mental health at baseline: Strandh et al showed that Swedish 18- to 21-year-old NEETs who were actively seeking for work had more internalized mental health problems at age 21 and 43 than employed individuals [43]. Thern et al still found a significant effect of registered unemployment for more than 6 months at age 17 to 24 on mental health at age 34/35 when controlling for mental health at baseline [40].…”

How unemployment and precarious employment affect the health of young people: A scoping study on social determinants

“…From the 108 remaining articles, 64 were removed because they did not meet the eligibility criteria. This left 46 [12, 35-79] in the actual review (see Figure 1). Common reasons for exclusion were lack of pertinence, not meeting the inclusion criteria and treating unemployment as a dependant variable.…”

Precarious employment is a risk factor for poor mental health in young individuals in Sweden: a cohort study with multiple follow-ups

“…It is often argued that well developed welfare states with active labour market policies can buffer the negative effects of a precarious labour market [ 15 ]. In a recent Swedish study, it was found that programs directed at young persons at risk of labour market exclusion led to a positive mental health development later in life, compared to those who experienced unemployment during the same time period [ 16 ].…”