2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do open star clusters evolve towards energy equipartition?

Abstract: We investigate whether open clusters (OCs) tend to energy equipartition, by means of direct N-body simulations with a broken power-law mass function. We find that the simulated OCs become strongly mass segregated, but the local velocity dispersion does not depend on the stellar mass for most of the mass range: the curve of the velocity dispersion as a function of mass is nearly flat even after several half-mass relaxation times, regardless of the adopted stellar evolution recipes and Galactic tidal field model… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Quintuplet, we assume a cluster mass of 2 × 10 4 M , a half-mass radius 2 of 1.4 pc, and an IMF consistent with local star forming regions for 0.08 M < M < 0.5 M (dN/dm ∝ m −1.3 ; Kroupa 2002), and the Arches cluster for M > 0.5 M (dN/dm ∝ m −1.8 ; Hosek et al 2019). This yields an overall half-mass relaxation time of ∼ 42 Myr and a relaxation time of ∼ 6 Myr for stars around 10 M (Spitzer 1987;Spera et al 2016;Angelo et al 2018). The corresponding calculation for the Arches yields an overall half-mass relaxation time of ∼ 13 Myr and a relaxation time of only ∼ 2 Myr for 10 M stars.…”
Section: Mass Segregation In Ymcsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For the Quintuplet, we assume a cluster mass of 2 × 10 4 M , a half-mass radius 2 of 1.4 pc, and an IMF consistent with local star forming regions for 0.08 M < M < 0.5 M (dN/dm ∝ m −1.3 ; Kroupa 2002), and the Arches cluster for M > 0.5 M (dN/dm ∝ m −1.8 ; Hosek et al 2019). This yields an overall half-mass relaxation time of ∼ 42 Myr and a relaxation time of ∼ 6 Myr for stars around 10 M (Spitzer 1987;Spera et al 2016;Angelo et al 2018). The corresponding calculation for the Arches yields an overall half-mass relaxation time of ∼ 13 Myr and a relaxation time of only ∼ 2 Myr for 10 M stars.…”
Section: Mass Segregation In Ymcsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is currently unknown as to whether mass segregation is due to some facet of the star formation process (e.g., Bonnell & Davies 1998), whether it can be rapidly induced through dynamical interactions (e.g., Allison et al 2009), or 5 Note that not all self-gravitating systems can attain complete energy equipartition (Spitzer 1969;Trenti & van der Marel 2013). whether the two processes can develop independently (e.g., Spera et al 2016).…”
Section: Velocity Dispersions As a Function Of Stellar Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, the velocity dispersion and spatial extent of lighter-than-average stars increases. Complete energy equipartion is never reached (see Trenti & van der Marel 2013;Bianchini et al 2016;Spera et al 2016) because GCs are open systems -stars that gain too much energy become unbound. The two-body relaxation time (which has a median value of ≈ 10 8 yr for galactic GCs; Heggie & Hut 2003) is the relevant time-scale over which globular clusters undergo mass segregation, and it depends primarily on mass and radius, with compact low-mass clusters characterized by shorter relaxation times compared to extended and highmass counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%